2007-08-25 13:10:04 · 5 answers · asked by Dorothy Jane D 1 in Arts & Humanities ➔ Genealogy
I agree with answer #1 and #2. AND, violating someone's legal given right to privacy could land you in court, too.
2007-08-25 14:20:13 · answer #1 · answered by Annabelle 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
No it's not, I think its a gross invasion of their privacy. In this country we are governed by the "data protection act". There are things like leaving someone wide open to "identity theft", I know I wouldn't want to be responsible for causing this to happen to someone for the sake of two points and I wouldn't like to think some one had done it to me either.
2007-08-25 14:23:11 · answer #2 · answered by itsjustme 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, it is not ethical. Not only that, it places their identity in risk and perhaps even their lives, if a disgruntled Ex or whatever is looking for them.
2007-08-25 13:58:41 · answer #3 · answered by Nothingusefullearnedinschool 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Just their names show. All the other information is blocked on my tribalpage tree. On my Ancestry.com tree it says: Living Belflower. I see nothing wrong with that!
2007-08-25 18:52:46 · answer #4 · answered by DrMichael 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
only with their permission. otherwise, it is highly unethical and a violation of the person's privacy.
2007-08-25 13:19:53 · answer #5 · answered by sugarbabe 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋