I'm glad she got deported. Hanging out in our churches seeking sanctuary - I'm suprised that our goverment allowed her to stay for so long. We should make an example out of her so others know we are serious about cracking down on illegal immigration.
2007-08-25
06:54:40
·
15 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Politics & Government
➔ Immigration
EDIT: How is it that Elvira Arellano was wrongfully deported?
2007-08-25
06:54:57 ·
update #1
Soperson, fty, "Native Americans" migrated from Asia :)
2007-08-25
07:07:27 ·
update #2
http://www.texancultures.utsa.edu/publications/texansoneandall/nativeamerican.htm
2007-08-25
07:08:10 ·
update #3
Ricmon87 - I didn't say anything wrong in the question. It was removed because you or some other pro-illegal couldn't deal with the fact that others have different views and opinions. If can't handle the heat, stay out.
2007-08-25
09:35:29 ·
update #4
Borreguini01 - Native Americans also immigrated from Asia. You've been reported.
http://www.texancultures.utsa.edu/publications/texansoneandall/nativeamerican.htm
2007-08-25
09:36:24 ·
update #5
Arellano was rightfully deported, as a convicted felon, and an illegal alien.
Dropping an anchor baby on US soil does not give anyone the right to be in the USA illegally.
Let us hope everyone now understands that.
Let Arellano be an example for every woman who is thinking that if she comes into the USA just to have a baby here, thinking that it will give her some leverage (using that kid as a crummy way to break our laws), she WILL BE DEPORTED.
edit: for soperson, as a First Nations, U.S. native American indian, let me clue you in, ALL U.S.citizens are legal citizens on this nation, it does not matter what your ethnicity is.
And since this issue has been on the table over the Arellano case - Mexicans are NOT "indigenous" to the USA. Mexicans are not U.S. native American indians, and do not have the right to call themselves any such thing.
2007-08-25 07:06:53
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
8⤊
5⤋
It was perfectly legal, that parish did not act in accordance with Catholic church teaching regarding immigration, it acted in accordence with a few blow hards in the US Bishop's Conference, which never speak infallibly about church doctrine. In short the parish was wrong to harbor a criminal like they did. She was rightfully deported, but to prevent a next time I think a child born in the US must be a child of at least one legal resident and/or citizen of the United States; no more get pregnant cross the border and use your child as a tool garbage.
Possibly charge her for fraud and identity theft for stealing a Social Security number.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
And on a side note...
soperson, learn a little history, there was not one wave of immigration to the Americas, there were several. The American Indians were actually one of the last waves, many California tribes belong to other influxes. The tribes fought tooth and nail for land, and frequently destroyed and/or pushed off other peoples already living there. Read about Kennewick man if you think I'm lying. Or how about the journals of the Radisson brothers; the French had just as much claim to Michigan's upper penninsula and to Minnesota as the Ojibway; in many respects they had more of a claim to the land, the Ojibway were still pushing other tribes out of the area in the 1600's.
2007-08-25 14:16:24
·
answer #2
·
answered by 29 characters to work with...... 5
·
6⤊
2⤋
She wasn't wrongfully deported and I'm Pro Reform.But a deportation order is WILLFUL violation of federal Law.Honestly there's not many laws concerning illegal LIVING in the U S but there are laws that pertain to Border Entry that's one of the reason they don't actively seek out illegal immigrants.But those with DEPORTATION orders are subject to ALL immigration laws.
DM-e-mail please
2007-08-25 14:24:00
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
2⤋
you guys act as if she was the first illegal immigrant to be deported. so how would that be an example?
you guys know you have nothing else to say about her. she was deported already, yet you guys are still crying and moaning.
And if this question got removed, it was for a good reason, now stop violating YA guidelines.
2007-08-25 16:00:45
·
answer #4
·
answered by rmon 6
·
0⤊
3⤋
She wasn't wrongfully deported. She broke the law; she paid the price (and unfortunately, so did her loved ones -- and SHE is responsible).
2007-08-25 14:14:31
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
1⤋
I don't feel she was wrongfully deported, I think it was the right thing to do, only way too long!
She should have been out of that Church and sent home, we can't have this happening with all illegals, taking a Church hostage!
2007-08-25 14:00:07
·
answer #6
·
answered by ♥ ♥Be Happi♥ ♥ 6
·
11⤊
3⤋
I agree with you 100%. The illegal alien advocates are using her as a role model/poster child. It's so ridiculous! She is a criminal felon! Now the case for amnesty for illegal immigration is getting weaker and weaker thanks to Elvira. Who wants criminals like her in our country?
2007-08-25 14:26:24
·
answer #7
·
answered by GoYankees&Giants! 5
·
5⤊
2⤋
Well then, good for you re-posting your question. I don't know of any factual defense that could be used to claim wrongful deportation. It goes a bit beyond that though because she is "persona non grata" as well.
2007-08-25 13:59:04
·
answer #8
·
answered by GoodJuJu2U 6
·
5⤊
3⤋
How sad that we have to feel bad for upholding our laws. Elvira was a criminal while she was here. Boy if I could get a hold of the poor bastard that had his/her identity stolen by Elvira, I'm sure his story would be more sad than hers.
2007-08-25 14:04:29
·
answer #9
·
answered by dontwantjunk 1
·
9⤊
4⤋
I hope she tries to fight for the working people while in Mexico, instead of just trying to come back to the U.S.
2007-08-25 14:16:12
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
5⤊
2⤋