Yahweh creator of the univers used time over matter to create it ,in our english vocabulary it means evolution which means changing through time. it is imposible to have created the universe and all in 144 hours. it took billions of years to do it everyone that says it is false must go and study more, because that is realy believing in fairytales
2007-08-24 22:41:52
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
1⤋
False, i will get thumbs down for this but oh well. I will admit evolution has a lot of points or features to its theory that pretty much gets you thinking about whether or not there is a creator. But you see, people don't understand a lot about the Bible, unless they have really researched it to see if its valid or not i will not listen to them. I have gone into both. I have chosen there being a God. Not to what most religions take into believing in about him. But in the Bible (this is response to some of the users who commented) it implies that OUR view of time is not as God's is. ie: the day. 144 days the whole world cannot be created, this is true, at least, in our time. Remember adam and eve were told the would die on the exact day of eating the fruit, in our view of time did they?no. They lived up to be nearly 100, in God's eyes time works differently for he is a different being. But i know even then evolutionist or atheists won't comply with me. But its this simple fact you must even agree with, people don't like putting faith into things that cannot be explained or they cannot understand in any matter. How can I? well i just look at how i can believe in God, for example prophecies, that had been fulfilled throughout Revelation and knowing that God has a plan, and he isnt "screwing up" or not stepping in to help humanity right now, and being completely interested about how thousands of years ago how it could be that what was written in the Bible did not even sail the ocean or have telescopes could know the earth was round or how animals instincts are (this was made manifested before anybody even had come to terms with it). I'm not one of those who are fanatics and believe God is causing naturual disasters or people are going to "hell" for not doing everything he wants. But i am neither one who believe he doesnt exist all together.
Email me if you would like more information, but no pressure man. People get crazy with this type of question.
2007-08-25 12:42:21
·
answer #2
·
answered by jrichelled 3
·
0⤊
1⤋
True and everybody knows it.
There's not a person alive who doesn't actually believe in evolution. They may say they don't because they misrepresent it as anti-religious propaganda, but they do actually believe in it.
The premise is this. If you have a kid, the child will inherit a mixture of your and the mother/father's genes. As the genes continue on, stronger genes stick and weaker genes fade away. As weaker genes fade, people and animals become more suited to their environment.
All throughout history people have known this--people have known that fathers and sons, mothers and daughters looked and acted alike in some way. They called it 'blood relation' and assumed that the blood, or something was passed down. That turned out to be a fact.
We still call it the 'theory' of evolution for the same reason we still call it the 'theory' of gravity. We know it's there, we just haven't mastered how it works or why.
2007-08-25 05:40:40
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
5⤊
1⤋
[Creationism/creation science/Intelligent Design is] "... an attempt to give credibility to Hebrew mythology by making people believe that the world's foremost biologists, paleontologists, and geologists are a bunch of incompetent nincompoops." ~ Ron Peterson
There are a few important things to know about biological 'evolution'...
* DNA DOES NOT evolve... it experiences mutations.
* Organisms DO NOT evolve.
Organisms are essentially the 'proxies' for altered DNA, playing out the 'game' of survival/procreation in 'meat space'. DNA whose proxy organisms manage to procreate get to move on to the next round... kind of like Jeopardy. This is where 'natural selection' plays out. 'Survival of the fittest' is a complete misapplication of the concept... it implies (and is usually interpreted to mean) faster, stronger, smarter, etc... able to take, rather than share. Granted... in some cases it MIGHT mean that. But MORE often, it means something like better camouflage... slightly better tolerance for arid conditions... a new protein that permits the use of a food source that was previously toxic to the organism... etc. THAT is 'natural selection'... ANYTHING that increases the STATISTICAL PROBABILITY that an organism will survive long enough to procreate... and that is ALL that it means.
* It is the genetic makeup of POPULATIONS of organisms (the 'gene pool') that 'evolves' (changes, over time).
Science does not 'prove' things. 'Proof' is for mathematicians, coin collectors and distillers of alcoholic beverages. Proof in science is applicable only in the 'negative' sense... i.e., hypotheses and theories must be 'falsifiable'. When scientists do experiments (to validate 'predicted' results), they are NOT trying to 'prove' they are RIGHT... they are trying to FIND OUT if they're WRONG. NOT being wrong simply builds confidence that one is on the right track... it 'proves' nothing.
Evolution is not a matter of 'belief'. I keep reading in here that "... evolution is just a theory... not a fact." That, as it turns out, is true... although the word 'just' is inappropriate, and misleading... and it indicates that people just don't understand what a scientific theory is; they seem to think that a theory is just an 'idea'. Nothing could be further from the truth.
In science, 'theories' occupy a higher level of importance than mere 'facts'... theories EXPLAIN facts. The Theory of Evolution provides an explanatory framework for the OBSERVED FACT that the genetic makeup of populations of organisms changes over time (evolves). The theory identifies two (2) mechanisms which account for such changes:
** Genetic drift... statistical variations in allele frequency within a local population, over time.
** Natural selection... the non-random replication of randomly varying replicators.
There may be OTHER mechanisms in play which have not yet been identified and accounted for, and various scientists continue to quibble about that... but NONE of what I have described above is in dispute within the scientific community. Claims to the contrary by creationists are nothing more than a red herring, designed to bamboozle their scientifically-ignorant constituency... which is VERY easy to do. That's what happens when your 'trusted' sources are professional liars whose livlihood depends on keeping their 'flock' (sheeple) steeped in gullibility, self-delusion, ignorance and irrationality.
Finally... theories are not about 'truth'... the value of a theory is defermined by its USEFULNESS. On that basis, the 'Theory of Evolution' is considered by many scientists to be the most valuable (useful) theory, ever.
.
2007-08-25 06:36:37
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
0⤋
Evolution is a fact.
Evolution is a slow process. To say that evolution is false because you cannot observe it over a lifetime is like looking at a five-year old boy for 10 seconds, not observing any visible growth and claiming that he is not growing.
2007-08-25 06:18:10
·
answer #5
·
answered by qxzqxzqxz 7
·
3⤊
1⤋
true . scientifically true , more and more evidence every year.
lets assume you believe bible is accurate. read noah flood.
compare the amount of species of animal and insect taken into the boat.
compare the amount of species now with the number of species of animals / insect taken INTO the boat.
one explanation = evolution
scientifically and biologically , human = animal.
if animal in noah flood can evolve , why cant human ? sure you buy those apologetic crapsh1t from those religious website.
church even imprison galileo when he prove earth rotate around sun , but you ever seen atheist jailing a religious person for being so ? no
this show how far a religious person would do if someone is a threat or show evidence that question their religion.
galileo could be wrong then , but instead of proving him wrong , they took the easy step and imprison him , in order to stop him from telling people the fact.
and oh for those stupids out there animal extinct for 3 reason
1: sudden mass change in enviroment , such as a sudden drop in temperature world wide.
2: overly hunt by human , or new species from other parts of the world being introduce to other parts of the world , cause change in the food chain and thus extinction for some , usually localise
3: they have all successfully evolved into modern animals , think of mammoth and current elephant.
please read and think with the brain given to you by your god
2007-08-25 05:53:06
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
6⤊
1⤋
EVOLUTION is a true fact of life !and the scientific world
has proven it time and time again,we can not help the way the Christian population of the world perceive that they were created ? But if that were a fact ,then produce the MOULD that "GOD - JC - or the HOLY SPIRIT " used to do this deed.
We have proven to you that we " Humans " Evolved from the humble ape,and i for one will keep defending my beliefs until i die,I will be worm food,maggot fodder and i definitely
won't be coming back,more to the point ? To What?
2007-08-25 05:53:43
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
8⤊
1⤋
Mikey –
Extinction is a part of evolution.
If extinction concerns you, why not ask your God why he keeps screwing up? Most of the species that have ever existed are now extinct. Shouldn’t your God have figured out how to do it right by now?
---------------
onegammyleg --
You skipped 'Science 101', huh?
------------------
jrichelled -
The thumbs down is not mine, but I know the real reason for it. It is because you confuse science with the folktales and mythological beliefs of illiterate goat herders who lived thousands of years ago.
2007-08-25 05:49:08
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
6⤊
1⤋
Science has not proven the evolution theory.
if it had , it wouldn't be a theory , it would be fact.
Unfortunately the fossil record does not show that man has come from an ape , or whatever.
The missing link is testimony to this.
It is missing , because the link isn't there.
2007-08-25 06:14:15
·
answer #9
·
answered by I♥U 6
·
1⤊
3⤋
Are you seriously asking this or are you just shocked that people can understand stories about pregnancy without sex or corpses coming back to life before they can understand evolution.
2007-08-25 05:39:54
·
answer #10
·
answered by kijafha 3
·
5⤊
1⤋