A ballistic pendulum is basically a mass at the end of a pivot arm, like any other pendulum. But a ballistic pendulum is special because the mass is designed to absorb a bullet shot at it. You fire a bullet at the pendulum, and then the pendulum (which now includes the bullet) swings up. When the bullet collides with the pendulum, energy of motion is not conserved because some of the energy becomes heat, noise, and deformation energy. However, momentum is conserved. Then, after the collision, the pendulum swings up and energy is conserved in this stage. So measuring the height of the pendulum's swing can be used to determine the gravitational potential energy at this point, which can be used to calculate the kinetic energy at the pendulum's rest point, which can be used to calculate the initial velocity of the pendulum/bullet combination, which can be used (via conservation of momentum) to calculate the original velocity of the bullet.
The ballistic pendulum would be used to determine the velocity of different types of bullets under various types of conditions, in recreations of shooting incidents. However, modern chronographs can directly measure the speed of an artillery projectile, making the ballistic pendulum obsolete. It remains useful, however, for demonstrating properties of physics.
2007-08-27 02:48:44
·
answer #1
·
answered by DavidK93 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
A ballistic pendulum is used to measure the momentum of a bullet, from which can be measured the bullet's speed and energy. The bullet is shot at the pendulum and then you measure how far the pendulum swings. From that you calculate how much force the bullet had on the pendulum.
Sorry, the math is beyond me. 8^)
2007-08-24 15:41:49
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
specific! by this direct quote from the article you suitable to! "yet he additionally suggested he ought to not make specific the voice as Trayvon's, because of the fact he did not have a pattern of the teenager's voice." right here is yet another quote out of your article that makes me question the findings! Owen instructed the newspaper that the appliance in comparison the screams to Zimmerman's voice and back a 40 8 % tournament. He suggested he could anticipate a tournament of better than ninety %, thinking the known of the audio." So a virtually 50% tournament proves that is not Zimmerman because of the fact he predicted a ninety% tournament?! To me a virtually 50% tournament makes it inconclusive! Why did not he have a pattern of Trayvons voice?! Are you fairly going to tell me in immediately's digital international the place each and every cellular telephone takes video there is not any recording of his voice? i think of i will anticipate the trial have been each and all the information would be laid out in the past leaping to a end which will smash someones life!
2016-10-03 05:00:52
·
answer #3
·
answered by gearlds 4
·
0⤊
0⤋