English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

10 answers

No real archeological evidence, but there is a lot of speculation about it. Wyatt, who was mentioned earlier, has been disputed by most real archeologist and religious scholars, and there is no real proof to anything he has said. Some of the legend about the arc was that the Templars found the arc in Jerusalem under the ruined first temple of solomon durring the crusades, and took it back to France, but there is not real proof to it.

As a side note, the ten commandmants actually take most of their basis from a similar Egyptian form of laws commonly known as Ma'at's laws or the Declarations to Rekhti-merti-f-ent-Ma'at, which have many of the same ideals in them, along with various other laws that had mostly to do with Egyptian beliefs. These date from over a thousand years previous to the origin of the Moses story.

Lord AmonRaHa

2007-08-24 18:03:04 · answer #1 · answered by Lord AmonRaHa 3 · 0 0

When you say unbiased, I assume you mean anything other than faith--which for me is strong enough.

The first stone tablets were broken by Moses when he descended from the mountain and saw the people building a Golden Calf.

The second set of stone tablets were put in an ark inside the Second Temple, but when the Babylonians captured the Temple, the ark was not there.

So, no, except for faith, there is no longer any proof. But, note that the Jews, (both Messianic and Rabbinic) the Christians and the Muslims all mention the ark in their respective Books---although as a messinaic Jew, I believe that being Christian is the same as being a Messianic Believer.

2007-08-24 22:45:17 · answer #2 · answered by sirburd 4 · 0 0

Graham Hancock wrote an intriguing book, "The Sign and the Seal", in which he documents his own search for the Ark of the Covenant. Hancock is a British journalist who is more sensational than credible at times, but this book is worth a read if you're interested in the subject. Go here:

http://www.grahamhancock.com/library/sats/default.htm

.

2007-08-24 22:47:34 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Ironically, no, because ALL evidence is subject to interpretation, and that interpretation comes through a biased source (a person). It doesn't matter if the arguement portrayed is pro or con (for or against) the object: the person making the statement HAS BIAS.

It doesn't matter what evidence a person looks at: they filter all that they see through the opinions they have already formed of the topic. Those opinions form that person's bias.

2007-08-24 22:48:27 · answer #4 · answered by MamaBear 6 · 0 1

Ron Wyatt discovered the Ark of the covenant, which included the 10 commandments. You can go to www.anchorstone.com and look at his testimony. I personally know that he found it just by looking at the sketch he made of what he saw. There are certain details about it that I've been made aware of that most people wouldn't know about.
The stone tablets are real, and eventually they will be brought out from where they are hidden at the moment.

2007-08-24 22:36:07 · answer #5 · answered by witnessnbr1 4 · 1 2

Any evidence there was disappeared with the ark of the covenant around 500 B.C.

2007-08-24 22:35:57 · answer #6 · answered by Lukusmcain// 7 · 0 1

Do you think the Hebrews built the ark of the covenant to carry a lot of air around?

2007-08-24 22:40:02 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

No

atheist

2007-08-24 22:36:28 · answer #8 · answered by AuroraDawn 7 · 1 0

No there's not. If they were out there, we would have found them by now...same thing with Noah's Ark.

2007-08-24 22:35:31 · answer #9 · answered by Adam G 6 · 2 0

God's Word~He cannot lie

2007-08-24 22:34:16 · answer #10 · answered by sego lily 7 · 0 4

fedest.com, questions and answers