Very sad!
2007-08-24 14:21:28 · 20 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Military
You mean an Iraqi family?
did you hear about the neighborhood that lost whole families?
2007-08-24 14:27:36 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 5⤋
No, but I heard of a million others who have lost daughter and sons on both sides to this stupid war only to make Bush and his terrorist buddies richer.
BTW did you attend the last auction where hundreds of companies struck millionaire deals at the expense of Iraq? Guess what, many of them were Bush's friends, coinkindink? I think not. There are only two things on his tiny brain, cash and...oh,yeah, cash. He couldn't care less about the 52 stars and probably that's because not one of them voted for him, he's nothing but a big fraud just like his career supported by his daddy. I'm sure if he wasn't the son of his father he would probably be dead somewhere because he's one of the most mentally handicapped men I've ever seen, he can't even make a sandwich without killing 20 people. he's the biggest jerk in American history and it's s shame states have lost their reputation in the world. The world admired, respected and even loved you; now they all hate you.
2007-08-24 14:51:18 · answer #2 · answered by Der weiße Hexenmeister 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Yes, very sad, but have you ever heard of the "Fighting Sullivans"? Five brothers who died in WW2 aboard the USS Juneau after it was sunk by the Japanese?
And what about the Niland brothers, who fought together in WW2 as well, two of them died in combat (one while with the 82nd Airborne, the other while serving with the 4th Infantry Division) and one was a POW in Burma while the last one was with the Army Air Corps?
It was the Niland brother's story that inspired Steven Spilberg to make the movie "Saving Private Ryan".
2007-08-24 15:41:07 · answer #3 · answered by tercelclub 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
And? Is this some big news to you? Is it more sad then the one that lost one son? Or the the family that lost their only son? Is it less sad then the family that lost three sons in Vietnam? Is it less sad then the family that lost five sons in WWII? What are you getting at?
2007-08-24 14:30:00 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 3⤋
Ya, I watched it on the news last night. It broke my heart to see the family suffering. I could never imagine losing two family members. The one son that is still alive saw his other brother's helicopter go down. that is sad too!
2007-08-24 14:28:07 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
Hi
There's a lot of tetchy people on here tonight, you don't have to be so critical, if you don't like whats written or the content....don't answer but there's no need to be sounding so superior. Yes the loss of any life is sad, I can't imagine how it must feel to have that type of grief multiplied and I hope I never do.
Ray. West York's. U.K.
2007-08-24 14:51:23 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
Very bad luck for that family.
Apart from that I can't really see what sort of an answer you're waiting for.
2007-08-25 01:39:48 · answer #7 · answered by kisser 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes, it is hard in war. In WWII the Sullivan's lost five sons when their ship was sunk by the Japanese.
2007-08-24 14:37:01 · answer #8 · answered by Chris 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
youre absolutely right, that is very sad. did you hear about all the family members lost on 9/11? that was quite sad too.
2007-08-24 14:27:21 · answer #9 · answered by emily 2 · 6⤊ 2⤋
i work with a guy who has 3 sons in country right now.
2007-08-24 14:27:41 · answer #10 · answered by faceman888 4 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Did you hear about that family who lost 3 sons to drugs?
The family who lost 1 daughter to a drunken driver?
The family who lost a Father in a drive-by shooting?
All the families who lost their children in High School shootings?
Not to mention the national road toll, and all the people who are killed driving cars.
2007-08-24 14:29:21 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 7⤊ 4⤋