your spelling wouldn't have. wouldn't all the germans have arrived into the country with all their panzers and stukas etc and at the end of the day would be immigrants? retard.
2007-08-24 04:45:47
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
1⤋
Monopolar world of any kind is not good for the planet, more so if it is driven by some weird race based ideology, hatred or obsession. All of which were partof the Nazi programs, including extermination of UNWANTED races and religious groups.
In that light alone, the Nazi Germany holding sway over the globe would have been a very very bad thing.
How ever, the allies (lol) hadnt fared any better nor have done any better.
The British, portugese, french, spanish... occupational forces (colonizers) caused untold miseries amongthe natives mostly treating them below menial animals and beasts-- looted, raped, pillaged, abused, muredered at will and often just for fun.
There is hardly any instance of them honoring any pacts with the native people.
That is exactly what their forces have been doing post world war too. remember Korea, Vietnam?? and what exactly are they doing in Iraq & afghanistan??
The much toted human rights stuff is but an eyewash and reads only for their own populace. Others dont have anyright what-so-ever--- including those of life, honor, livelihood or religion.
Immigration to the Americas: would have gone up substantially as it too would have come under the influence of the super power(s) Germany & Japan- who fought the wars primarily to get more land and resources for their poplulace.
2007-08-25 05:23:50
·
answer #2
·
answered by kapilbansalagra 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
If they had then most of us posting on here would never have been born. Take a look at what the Germans did to the populations of the countries they occupied.
The Nazis formed policies if they sounded radical. They exterminated disabled German children. They enslaved and butchered anyone they considered inferior - practically everyone that did not fit into their ideals.
They promoted paranoia and had frighteningly absurd economic policies.
The Waffen SS - the armed branch of the SS were responsible for some of the most horrendous atrocities I've ever heard of - mass murder, child murder, rape - the list is endless.
Lastly, it's a little bit more than ungrateful to all those who died fighting the Nazis and ensuring that we could be born in freedom to assume that losing the war may have been a good thing.
We might have made a mess of it so far, but those people sacrificed themselves for our freedom and we should never forget it.
2007-08-24 11:58:25
·
answer #3
·
answered by Nexus6 6
·
2⤊
0⤋
Some do agree with hilters motive!..having a master race that was said that war on that scale would not happen again, and people would get on peacefully.
Germany occuping britain at that time would still be considered to be illegal immagration.
Im glad we defeated the Germans but sad that they lost young men and women too. Jamie ( British )
2007-08-24 13:46:22
·
answer #4
·
answered by Jamie79 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Assuming Hitler did not screw up and declared war on the United States on 9 December 1941 in support of his Japanese Axis partner. Also assuming the FDR lost popular support following the Attack on Pearl Harbor not allowing him to pursue the war in Europe, the British might have continued their defense of their Island Empire with the Lend Lease support we had already committed to providing them.
The Afrika Korps might have been able to continue combat operations without the American Western Task Force landing in North Africa, November 1942. That's not to say the DAK might have defeated the British 8th Army in North Africa, Rommel's tactics prior to that indicates the Germans were willing to delay the final outcome. Without the American assisting the British in creating a second front in Africa, Sicily, Italy and then France in 1944, the Germans would have been able to focus most of combat ground and air forces against the Soviets.
It unlikely the Soviets would have survive against the Germans had the Germans had been permitted to focus on just one front. Assuming the it took a couple years longer,but Germany resolves the war in the East by 1946 or 1947. The Luftwaffe would have been flying jets like the Fockwulf TA183 and the Heinkel He 162A, German Rocket Forces would be able to launch the A4-A9 Intercontinuel Missiles against New York City if they wanted to strike at us.
The U.S. war against Japan by itself might have not forced the same levels of research and development, the U.S. might have been sorely lacking to oppose the German war machine of 1946 or 1947.
At some point the Nazis Germany might decide to invade America, can you image armored combat between King Tiger tanks against unimproved M4 Sherman tanks, no M26 Pershings or M46 Patton I tanks to oppose their attack. If the Germans had been permitted to win the last European war we probably wouldn't have been very far behind...
2007-08-24 13:08:32
·
answer #5
·
answered by oscarsix5 5
·
2⤊
0⤋
Had it occurred to you that the 'immigration sorting' carried out by the Germans if they had won WWII might have included your family. Perhaps only blond people over 6 foot would have been allowed to remain in the UK.
2007-08-24 12:15:37
·
answer #6
·
answered by john 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
The Germans would have had better chance of staying in power a while longer. Russia and Germany had a non-aggresion pact when they invaded Polland and divided up the country. Hitler would not leave the Russians alone and invaded and Russia struck back. That ended the war on 2 fronts. Nuc bombs ended Japan and if need be would have ended the European theater... The answer is no...
2007-08-24 11:56:23
·
answer #7
·
answered by Gerald 6
·
1⤊
2⤋
NO! The Germans should've won World War One so that World War Two wouldn't of occured. If they won in 1914 as planned we wouldnt be having the same problems today.
2007-08-24 12:38:10
·
answer #8
·
answered by Roderick F 6
·
2⤊
1⤋
They should have won the war because they had every advantage. Numbers, decent equipment, tactics, special weapons. The Germans even had the first assault rifle.
There was just one problem, Hitler. His incompetance thankfully cost them the war.
It doesnt take Nazi ideals to stop immigration, just a pair of big brass balls.
2007-08-24 15:24:13
·
answer #9
·
answered by futuretopgun101 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
My old man used to say the same when he was alive and he was a RM Commando who spent 6 years fighting them!!
2007-08-24 12:13:22
·
answer #10
·
answered by one shot 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
Hitler rejected generals demand for escalation of Heavy water and nuclear fission, in order to further excellerate annialation of Jews.
He was doing his father's business which was to eliminate the Jewish race before Israel came back into existance.
2007-08-24 11:47:07
·
answer #11
·
answered by Thomas Paine 5
·
1⤊
2⤋