Why would people rather believe that a bunch of subatomic particles existed before anything else and not God?

Question

Why would the idea of nonliving things be more palitable to a sentent being that is above the physical?

Answer 1

anesthetic vs aesthetic

Answer 2

It's not a question of what's palatable. It's a question of what's more likely.

It is highly unlikely that these subatomic particles came out of nowhere but it is even more unlikely that a sentient, perfect and uncreated being was just there to create everything or get life moving.

And possibly, if there is a reason that some people would rather posit subatomic particles than God, perhaps it is because scientific, non-supernatural explanations allow for further study and more explanations. To take what we don't understand and stick it in a supernatural realm beyond human understanding defeats the purpose of science.

Answer 3

there's no longer something inherently illogical related to the belief of eternal existence. this could be very genuine for a being exterior of nature (large organic). so some distance as technological awareness can tell, the universe did have a commencing up. it is likewise increasing at an increasing fee, which might recommend that there is not any cyclical great Bang-great Crash happening. i do no longer think of subatomic debris constantly existed. in the event that they have been infinitely previous, so could the universe. that could desire to point by using 2 regulation of thermodynamics, the universe could have reached warmth loss of existence a limiteless length of time in the past. existence did start up on the planet. a minimum of, what existence there is that all of us comprehend of. on the grounds that all issues that have a commencing up had a causal experience that started out the technique of their coming to being, then the only logical clarification could be that the causal experience grew to become into something exterior of linear time. We Christians call that God.

Answer 4

Because as atheism grows, and man becomes more technologically advanced (or probably the other way around), mankind seems to want to believe each other rather than have faith in what they can't see.

Although mankind as repeatedly been wrong, people still trust each other over God. It's illogical, but a lot of things we as humans do are illogical. I guess this is just another example.

The war has always been between God and man's technology. We like to think we can figure everything out and do it all on our own. We have a hard time accepting that we have to submit to a higher authority....but then we submit to government.

Like I said, it's illogical. Believe me i've tried to see it from their point of view but it never makes sense. Mankind is not all that great. We don't have all the answers.....but God does.

Answer 5

Because the math and therories of subatomic particles make more sense to some than the concept of something they can't mathmatically prove or therorize without accepting the words of an ancient book full of emotion, group brainwashing and judgements against people who do don't believe as they do.

Answer 6

I think the problem here lies in your wording of the question; specifically, your use of the word "rather". I'd rather believe that there's a God, and that there really is some greater power up there guiding us for some purpose.
However, I can't force myself to believe something, even though I'd rather it be true.
I'd rather believe that people aren't getting robbed and murdered in this world, but evidence points to the contrary. I've been given no reason to believe that there's a God, so how can I simply choose to believe in one? There's been no religion as of yet that has given me a reason to believe it more than any other, but science has given me something more solid, something more tangible, and so I have no choice but to believe it.
Again, the problem here is not that people don't want to believe in God, it's that they just can't do it. You can't force yourself to believe in something, because if you're forcing it, then you're not really believing it.

Answer 7

I stand on neither side of this fence... however I think that it has something to do with the fact that science can trace evolution and can help to prove where we came from as opposed to some all knowing being that we have no proof of existing. Good honest question.

Answer 8

Reason being not to reason,for neither you nor GOD were created by a bunch of subatomic particles,It was through the spirit that created you which dwells in you,that which is in you your soul,is through the spirit of GOD.
No Need to ask.SEEK

Answer 9

It isn't altogether their fault, satan is a very crafty deceiver that has them so deceived they don't even care if they spend eternity in an incinerator. That's sad. But it's easy to laugh until they are actually experiencing it, with no way out.
In the Bible it clearly states,They strain at a gnat ( by not wanting to endure a little spiritual building hardships now ) but they swallow a camel ( by spending eternity in hell ).

Take care and may God bless you spiritually.

Answer 10

why can people not accept that God may have "created" those subatomic particles that led to our existence?

why can people only believe what is written out in the Bible? A book, that, while inspired by God, (II Timothy 3:16), was actually written by human beings, who brought into their writings, their own ideas, their own knowledge/education, prejudices and customs of the days....many times writing down stories that had been passed down verbally from generation to generation.

Why does your faith only rest in the written word of men...and not in God...who can transcend all religion, all man and all writings.

Answer 11

Easier to believe the lie than the truth. The master deceiver, satan, makes the lie believeable and there are those who believe it.
Isn't is funny how it is said we evolved from dust and yet we all haven't blown away in the air?