English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

1. As wholes include you, you are as part.
2. As parts compose you, you are as whole.
3. As influences influence you, you are as sensation.
4. As sensations sense you, you are as influence.
5. As derivatives inherit you, you are as origin.
6. As origins originate you, you are as derivative.
7. As equivalences equate you, you are as uniqueness.
8. As differences distinguish you, you are as equivalence.
9. As limits limit you, you are as link.
10. As links link you, you are as limit.
11. As rules rule you, you are as condition.
12. As conditions condition you, you are as rule.
13. As intents intend you, you are as fulfillment.
14. As fulfillments fulfill you, you are as intent.

Which ones among the above are incorrect?

2007-08-22 23:08:38 · 5 answers · asked by The Knowledge Server 1 in Arts & Humanities Philosophy

5 answers

duh....Where am I? am totally lost here
lol

2007-08-22 23:20:41 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

1. As wholes include you, you are as part. True
2. As parts compose you, you are as whole. False
3. As influences influence you, you are as sensation. False
4. As sensations sense you, you are as influence. False
5. As derivatives inherit you, you are as origin. False
6. As origins originate you, you are as derivative. False
7. As equivalences equate you, you are as uniqueness. False
8. As differences distinguish you, you are as equivalence. You are equivalent to something. True
9. As limits limit you, you are as link. Incoherent
10. As links link you, you are as limit. Incoherent
11. As rules rule you, you are as condition. False; You are as subject
12. As conditions condition you, you are as rule. false; you are product.
13. As intents intend you, you are as fulfillment. false certainty
14. As fulfillment's fulfill you, you are as intent. false; denies equilibrium.

2007-08-23 14:26:28 · answer #2 · answered by Psyengine 7 · 0 0

Number 3??

2007-08-22 23:16:33 · answer #3 · answered by WILNA S 4 · 0 0

There is no incorrect in your given statements. The latter statement concludes the former statement. Well derived statements you have.

2007-08-22 23:16:26 · answer #4 · answered by Third P 6 · 0 0

I'm guessing two. Parts may compose you, but you can't be sure if all parts are there.

2007-08-22 23:36:14 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers