There are some who wants a baby girl to be their first born and other couples prefer to have a baby boy to be their first born. Other than choice of preference of parents, what is really the significance of having a boy or a girl to be the eldest in a family?
2007-08-22 21:06:29 · 9 answers · asked by Salomon 1 in Pregnancy & Parenting ➔ Newborn & Baby
none really but from experience i had a boy then a girl ,it works well , but just being blessed with children is a gift ,it doesn't matter as long as they are fit and healthy xx
2007-08-22 21:16:20 · answer #1 · answered by ♥BEX♥ 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I have friends who really wanted a boy, so he would be the protector of the younger siblings. at first I really didnt want a boy EVER. and I did get a girl first. then I realised how wonderful boys can be, so I had 3 of them as well (like I got to choose huh?)
at the end of the day, theres no way of choosing what you want so you just get what youre given, gotta be happy with that.
2007-08-23 04:13:24 · answer #2 · answered by Dani 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Some want a boy to protect or to carry on a family name. I think it does not matter, as long as that baby is healthy.
2007-08-23 04:50:44 · answer #3 · answered by me 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
well.. boys could protect their younger siblings...
but for me, better have a boy coz my baby boy keep mu busy n stress all the time since he was 1 mo old... keep crying for any reason... i just sometime dunno what is wrong.... crying when put in pram, swing, car seat, cot... crying when changing nappies, when having abath, feeding time, sleeping time... anytime, anywhere crying ....
now even though he is not crying as much as before, but he still keep me busy, by crwaling everywhere, pulling anything down, very very active, wakes up early in the morning 6 am, sleeps late on nite, 8 pm... 1 hour in total of nap....
so, ya lots of works.... (not including washing, cooking n prep for me, husband n baby, cleaning the house, drying the clothes, ironing, shopping)
oh yeah
how ever, this experince gives me a ilustration of how "horrible" is having a boy, so next time i get another boy, i wont be surprise...
if i get a girl, i will be lucky.... more relax (most of babies girls of my friends are very calm and quiet)
2007-08-23 05:32:55 · answer #4 · answered by lucky_1179 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I heard a boy, the are more relaxed and less crying, atleast that what I heard. My sister and I had babies 2 months apart. My girl is more lets say active than her boy.
2007-08-23 04:12:09 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
i think having a boy just so as that when they are older the brother can protect his little sister. but at the same time i don't care as long as i have a healthy baby
2007-08-23 04:16:45 · answer #6 · answered by lokita 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
A boy because they can be the second head of the household and be a good, strong, leader of all the other siblings. I was glad when I had a boy first.
2007-08-23 08:53:17 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Girls are better lol....all my girlfriends have boys and i am the only one with a girl and i hear what they go through i am so happy i had a girl now. Peeing all over the place and cleaning them. Boys will be boys lol
2007-08-23 08:20:55 · answer #8 · answered by momma2beagain 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Some men want a boy first, It makes them feel manly.
Actually there is no better way or what is best to have first.
I was first born. I liked it
2007-08-23 05:39:07 · answer #9 · answered by clcalifornia 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋