According to who? Duck, you may get a some responses hurled back at you pretty hard. Great question though.
I personally don't think so. If a couple is unable to have a child, for any miriad of reasons, and they want a child, why not artificial insemination or adoption?
My god doesn't look down on me wanting to have children or take care of them.
2007-08-22 21:14:39
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I guess it would depend upon your religious beliefs and upbringing.
I have heard of those that feel if it is not possible for a couple to have a child "the old fashioned way", then it is God's will, and should not be interfered with. But that is one point of view.
My personal belief is that if you desire to have a child, and are unable for some reason any other way, then go for it. I see nothing wrong with it.
2007-08-23 04:15:34
·
answer #2
·
answered by volleyballchick (cowards block) 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Under what religion?
Morality is based on religion, sometimes on culture within a religion. So, any question of morality is necessarily dependent on what religious/cultural framework you want to apply.
Many religions have no say in the subject -- some oppose it as they oppose any medical or scientific procecure.
2007-08-23 04:08:35
·
answer #3
·
answered by coragryph 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
I have never heard of a moral objection to it. Most religions value children over most anything else. It is a blessing to most religions.
2007-08-23 04:14:47
·
answer #4
·
answered by bravozulu 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
If a couple needs it to have a kid, then yes.
2007-08-23 04:08:38
·
answer #5
·
answered by The Instant Classic 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
Oh brother!!!!! What nonsense
2007-08-23 04:09:12
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋