AMEN
2007-08-22 20:44:09
·
answer #1
·
answered by Alan C 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
Democrats and Republicans are the same. Behind close doors Dems and Reps are always in agreement. To the rest of the world, they act like they are against each other. This creates the illusion there are two sides of ever issue. In reality, they are the same thing. The Central Government, run by bureaucratic servants called Democrats and Republicans, know that there is a 11% approval rate of the government by the US citizens. This is unacceptable to the Dems and Reps. They need away to show there power. So creating a fear atmosphere, will get the citizens attention. This will also let them portray they are doing something for the citizens that cannot be done without the government. I't is a forced recognition of power in all its tyranny. One of the rules of war when facing a stronger enemy is to divide and conquer, rather then to attack your enemies force as a whole. Knowing that citizens and there constitutional freedoms/rights are a thee governments greatest enemy, creating a diversionary tactic such as Republican and Democrat would divide the governments enemies "citizens + constitutional freedoms/rights" Once divided, the enemy is far easier to conquer. In this case, when we are divided, the Central Government can take away freedoms/rights, and implement tyrannous laws a lot easier than if we were united. Vote for ANYONE else besides Democrats or Republicans. I't can be anyone ranging from a third party candidate to Mickey Mouse. Just don't vote for Democrats or Republicans. They were bought and paid for a long time ago by bureaucrats. When Dems or Reps are elected, they serve the interests of transnational corporations that paid for them to get elected, not the citizens. I't is the greatest acting out of a "good cop bad cop" scenario in history. Just remember; Ron Paul and The Tea Party are the Republican Party. "I'f your a multi-billion dollar transnational corporation and you pay for, 1 President + 435 Congressmen + 100 Senators + 9 Supreme Court Justices, then you have total power over 350,000,000+ citizens and all there resources." I'f you don't agree with any of this, you believe exactly what they wan't you to believe.
2016-05-20 22:15:08
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
There are a couple conflicting ideas on his Issues
The strongest point seems to be that he is in favour of "laxing food regulation" this seems down to earth but to let companies just put whatever the heck they'd like into food - is that safe? Think of all the bad stuff that happened before the Nazi FDA started restricting things - true there is still a lot of bad stuff but to let companies have free reign to make whatever they'd like and present it however they'd like - all the stupid people would be taken advantage of.
He is pro choice on what you eat - but not what is in your belly - as he is pro life - this seems an odd thing first off he expects you to have a baby but won't protect your food source?
What if someone ingested poison ? or a harmful substance that effected the fetus?
I do think that 'protecting' the borders is good there is a HUGE backup in Canada to US transit - hopefully extra Border Security Officers could lighten the work load and make it more timely and efficient to cross the border - 'while insuring security'
Of course without personal information collection it creates a HUGE gap in intelligence gathering capacity - I don't understand his personal privacy legislation as it creates an intelligence gap and reduces the capacity to effectively police the borders. - most US terrorist attacks in the US have been done by US citizens and residents not people entering the US. As for crime - if you don't do surveilance on potential criminals how do you find them and reduce their capacity to do business?
isn't this a US patriot identifier?
http://www.whitehouse.org/initiatives/patriot/index.asp
anyway - I don't understand why you think he is a patriot - he seems like a guy guy...
have the baby I eat what I'd like to, I hate taxes, bring the soilders home and get rid of the aliens and make it hard for foreigners to get into america.
In general he is for closed borders and isolationism, and less restrictions on companies - it seems.
Why is immigration a bad thing - the US was founded on Immigration.
If the FDA doesn't have enough powers to do their job effectively why restrict them - wouldn't giving them more capacities help them do their job? (and that is the story of US federal government rise to power..)
2007-08-22 21:09:02
·
answer #3
·
answered by intracircumcordei 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Honestly? Because people like you who throw ludicrous claims that the events of 9/11 were an inside job soil his credibilty with me, and many, many other like minded individuals like me, on both sides of the political spectrum. The loudest proponents of Ron Paul are also the loudest supporters of disproven insanity involving the events of 9/11.
There ya go.
2007-08-22 20:47:04
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋
He is in with all the 9/11 conspiracy theorist weirdos. And all of the Bush bashing young people in this country who don't know the first thing about politics - all they know is "Bush is Hitler" from their radical parents or liberal college professors support him and that's it.
2007-08-22 22:31:34
·
answer #5
·
answered by SW1 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
I see Ron Paul is now paying posters
2007-08-22 21:52:01
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
The problem is that too many Americans believe the government's propaganda that it is unpatriotic not to worship the government.
2007-08-22 21:21:54
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Come on. You can't seriously elect a libertarian.
Libertarians are nuts. Elect me, I will abolish Social Security! Oh, well, I won't abolish it, I just want to.
2007-08-22 20:48:13
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
Anyone who claim to be for "Privacy and Personal Liberty" and opposes choice is a hypocrite. Another right wing wing nut. Hey, vote for him, he's not gonna win.
2007-08-22 21:03:11
·
answer #9
·
answered by iwasnotanazipolka 7
·
0⤊
2⤋
Because many "true Americans" disagree with many of his political agendas.
2007-08-22 20:48:14
·
answer #10
·
answered by coragryph 7
·
1⤊
1⤋
How long have you been working for him?
2007-08-22 20:54:07
·
answer #11
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋