i'm american and i think he is the anti-christ
2007-08-22 20:18:53 · 16 answers · asked by xfileaddict1969 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
No, he's the worst president, since all the other bad presidents before him were not in the position of doing that kind of damage to the world. People talk about Hoover and Harding. Hah! What in blazes did Harding do compared to Bush's killing of nearly a million Iraqis? And Hoover did not cause the Great Depression. He just did nothing. I would rather have a Hoover or Harding today than a Bush with his murderous desires. Jackson may have been pretty bad, I will grant you. But not even Nixon broke the law as many times as Bush. Nixon had his aids commit a bit of burglry. Bush made it legal to burglarize anyone if he decides to. Bush thinks he has the power to indefinitely detain US citizens without notification or trial. Even Roosevelt, when he put the Japanese in camps, notified their relatives and made it public. Even an elementary school chjild can understand the impeachment crimes of this president (forgot the source, but it was a great article in the NY TImes).
2007-08-22 21:34:41 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
One,you have utterly no clue about the "Antichrist"Best to either read the bible or shut up about that.It only makes you look ignorant(pppst:The anti christ is supposed to be a hugely popular figure who most will believe is God himself).
Second,history will be kind to him,history will judge your kind as it judges the "hippie" movement.Pathetic,unemployed,whiners,whose idyllic little rose colored glasses nearly destroyed the US,culminating in the election of the worst president in history,Jimmy Carter,who was soundly defeated and tossed out on his ear,along with the entire hippie movement,when the US got a taste of their bullshyt rhetoric turned into action
2007-08-23 06:20:38 · answer #2 · answered by nobodinoze 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Okay i may not think Bush is a good president or agree with many of his policies, but i don't think he seems to be too bad of a man. It is impossible to judge a person as a human being without actually meeting them.
2007-08-23 03:26:04 · answer #3 · answered by UriK 5 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Nope, nope, and nope. Horrible president is a personal opinion, worst president ever well Jimmy Carter holds that record, and Stalin, Pol Pot, Saddam and Hitler all tie for the worst human being ever distinction.
You don't even know what the Bible says about the Anti-Christ, so please stop throwing that out there.
2007-08-23 03:26:13 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 2⤋
Bush is not evil, he is just very stupid and terribly misguided. A stupid president is worse than an evil one. Whether he's the worst ever, well, I think he is the worst of the modern era. There were probably worse or as bad in older times.
As for being the worst human being ever, that is not something that can be established. I saw people mention Hitler, Pol Pot, etc. well that's only the modern era. There were terrible "human" beings in history as well, some worse than the modern ones. You can't really hang that kind of tag on any one person.
2007-08-23 03:43:00 · answer #5 · answered by Jingizu 6 · 0⤊ 4⤋
a top 5 president
2007-08-23 03:34:09 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
We've had some pretty bad presidents. Harding rivals Bush for sheer corruption, but at least Harding was smart enough to know that he didn't really deserve the job and decent enough to die of a heart attack during his first term.
2007-08-23 03:24:07 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 3⤋
Bush > Clinton.
2007-08-23 03:31:25 · answer #8 · answered by Alan C 3 · 4⤊ 1⤋
I think the anti-christ would have a better command of the english language.
The guy's a dope, but don't worry, the US has survived bigger disasters than W.
2007-08-23 03:23:59 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 4⤋
Worst president ever. Second worst: Hoover.
2007-08-23 03:27:26 · answer #10 · answered by Giliathriel 4 · 1⤊ 5⤋