English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Neither of them have a snowball's chance.So do you think it is merely a tactic by the DNC to put them in the running? It does make the two front runners more appealing to independents--by comparison they could almost pass for moderates.

2007-08-22 07:40:34 · 13 answers · asked by Cherie 6 in Politics & Government Politics

13 answers

Someone has to make them look good, they certainly cannot do it on their own.

It also helps them look less socialist by having two commies up there with them.

2007-08-22 08:24:49 · answer #1 · answered by rmagedon 6 · 2 0

i'm probable going to vote Libertarian...and disagree with all 3 on many key subjects. one element i actual do like and know approximately Senator Obama is that...in case you do no longer consider him approximately something...he does not as we communicate start up shrieking you would be wanting to be the two evil, a liar, or area of a few great conspiracy. He recognizes that good human beings can honorably disagree, without the two element being cheating and deceitful. And in U.S. politics these days, it is uncommon as hell. i do no longer comprehend as much as i could like approximately Kucinich, i'm ashamed to declare. From what i've got seen of him, he seems smart and life like...nevertheless i'm confident we'd disagree on some issues. i know him for balloting against the Patriot Act, fantastically on the time he did so. I additionally know him for balloting against his occasion in prefer of investigating invoice Clinton's perjury interior the Monica Lewinsky mess. i could desire to work out us choose a woman President....Lord is attentive to, she could no longer probably be worse than most of the adult males we've elected in the process the years. (merely seem on the final 2...a bumbling incompetent and a mendacity perjurer.) That having been reported, i could vote for Saddam Hussein's rotting corpse earlier i could vote for Hillary Clinton.

2016-10-09 01:15:23 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

Edwards and Kucinich are old-school Democrats. Not for sale to corporate America.

The media will not allow them a 'snowball's chance' of winning.

2007-08-22 07:52:52 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 4 1

The dem candidates look like Snow Fright and the 7 Dwarfs.

2007-08-22 07:47:19 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 3 1

There is nothing we can do to make Kucinich and Obama more appealing. Hillary will get the nomination, and the presidency. Perhaps you should get used to the idea of hearing the phrase "President Clinton" again.

2007-08-22 07:46:46 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 3

Obama, and Clinton don't need Edwards, or Kucinich to make them seem appealing. Bush is doing that for them.

2007-08-22 07:47:15 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2 2

I wonder the same thing about the RNC...I mean its 2007, they have people running who dont believe in evolution...are those 3 people there to at least make the other guys look sane?

2007-08-22 07:44:48 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2 1

"Barack Hussin Obama"

I don't mean to be offensive, but do you really believe the average American will vote for that name on the ballot? That's as foreign as you can get here.

2007-08-22 07:46:06 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2 2

Guiliani, Thompson. and that godawful McCain. And you think there is something to say about Edwards and Kucinich.

2007-08-22 07:52:31 · answer #9 · answered by gone 7 · 1 3

all of them are communists so it do'nt matter witch one of them get's in if they are a Demonrat.
The only patriots are Republicans. they will at least protect the constitution.

2007-08-22 07:46:05 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

fedest.com, questions and answers