seattle moves to oklahoma city so vegas over seattle seems likely
2007-08-22 06:31:24 · 10 answers · asked by jumpmanwiz32 2 in Sports ➔ Basketball
look was happened with charlotte, players like wallace are no stars and carroll is a respectable shooter, link to my source http://www.draftexpress.com/viewarticle.php?a=2212
2007-08-22 09:07:44 · update #1
Why thin the talent out? That's just 2 more teams that need to find good players and its going to create shortages of them.
2007-08-22 06:47:34 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think they have too many teams now - adding more would only think out the talent level.
Now if you want to talk about moving teams - that's a different story. Teams that have little support from fans in their cities, should be able to relocate, IF the lack of support continues . . . NOT at every whim of the owner/ownership group.
As for Vegas being a destination - I vote no. It seems the players get in plenty of trouble as it is without all the extracurricular detractions that is Las Vegas.
2007-08-22 14:22:51 · answer #2 · answered by The Corinthian 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
NO!!!! If anything make the league smaller.24 teams, eliminate travel, make the season more compact/same amount of games start the season earlier end it earlier. There are already too many no talent/fundamental lacking players, coaches and referees in the league. the product is too watered down with all thes fringe highschool, foreign and undergraduate players. Drop the low attendance or teams in a close proximity to another team.candidates;atlanta, toronto, sacramento, clippers, memphis, new orleans, charlotte, minnesota, indiana, seattle or portland, new jersey
2007-08-22 15:14:35 · answer #3 · answered by ? 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
At this point, each division in the Eastern and Western conference have 5 teams a piece. I like that structure. Moving teams to a different city seems to be a better option than adding more teams to the league imo.
Moving teams like Memphis, Clippers, and Seattle may be options???
2007-08-22 14:53:50 · answer #4 · answered by Muffin 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It would be nice to have 2 more teams. I agree with Vegas.
2007-08-22 13:55:41 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
its a ok idea, but they recently just expanded to charlotte, and by adding 2 new teams its spreading out the talent more.
2007-08-22 15:01:42 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
i think they should drop out five teams and get rid of all the scrubs who dont average more then 2 points a game that would make the nba more interesting
2007-08-22 14:32:56 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
The league is already watered down, two more teams would make it that much more worst.
2007-08-26 10:32:07 · answer #8 · answered by Hi 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i dont know mabye 1 more team but not 2
2007-08-25 18:08:04 · answer #9 · answered by help me 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
there's certainly enough players to do that make 2 more expansion teams. they should put one in idaho.
2007-08-22 13:44:19 · answer #10 · answered by Matt 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋