Is this the Beginning of the End For the Democrat Party?
2007-08-22 06:11:22 · 12 answers · asked by john 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
Republican Rhetoric...Cite your source or get lost.
2007-08-22 06:16:20 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Not rhetoric. The Democraps and Repukelicans are working together to undermine what is in the best interests of the United States citizenry. Obama said it too: "The surge is working toward alleviating the worst violence" or some other shite. Fact is, Billary, Obama, and Edwards (the top Democrapic corrupt-idates) have an agenda EERILY similar to that of Romney, Gooliani and McCain, the Repukelican poli-tards. Don't believe me? Research the list of Bush and Pres. Clinton's own appointees: measure how many belong to the CFR, IMF, World Bank or other Tri-lateral type organizations.
2007-08-22 06:26:19 · answer #2 · answered by irish_american_psycho 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
She didn't say that. She said that some progress has been made in Anbar Province. BTW, John Warner says that there is no evidence that the surge is working.
Is this the end for the Republican Party?
"In a joint statement, Sens. Carl Levin, D-Mich., the committee's chairman, and John Warner, R-Va., the committee's senior Republican, said that while a surge of U.S. troops had tamped down violence in some parts of Baghdad, there was no sign of political reconciliation between Iraq's Sunni and Shiite rivals and "we are not optimistic about the prospects." They said U.S. Ambassador to Iraq Ryan Crocker shared their views."
2007-08-22 06:18:47 · answer #3 · answered by celticexpress 4 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Don't get too excited. She knows she has the democratic nomination wrapped up so now she's going to move to the middle, just like Bill did. But don't worry. If this facade results in her getting elected she will shed that pretense of moderation and behave like the uber-socialist she is.
Bill did it. She'll do it. Count on it. These people are nothing if not political animals. Her problem is that this time we've got so much more of her 'on tape'. Anything moderate she 'says' can be easily countered by showing what's actually behind her rather large facade.
2007-08-22 06:21:19 · answer #4 · answered by The emperor has no clothes 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
because of the fact political social gathering bosses will straddle the fence till they see which way is greater favorable for them to lean. while Obama started racking up regular victories, identifying on up pledged delegates, and outraising Hillary they figured he may be the winner so as that they grew to become their back on Hillary. The events on the two facets additionally want this One huge chuffed family individuals image going into the convention and so as that they want to teach their interest to campaigning against McCain fairly than have the endured infighting. In modern-day historic past, the social gathering that became no longer unified in the back of a single candidate going into the convention ended up dropping in November. i think of there is been too lots mentioned between the two applicants for them back at the same time. the way I see it, a sturdy form of Hillary supporters won't vote for Obama for President. in spite of if Hillary is on the value ticket as vice chairman, he will nonetheless be the Presidential candidate and that's what they do no longer want.
2016-12-16 03:05:21 · answer #5 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, Hillary is appealing to the moderate independent voter. She believes that she has the Dem nomination sewed up, so she is now campaigning as a moderate. She will state that the surge is working militarily, but that there has been no progress politically in Iraq, and we can't "win" in Iraq without a political solution. Everyone agrees that it will take a political solution to end this war.
2007-08-22 06:22:49 · answer #6 · answered by Shane 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Hillbilly is trying to get the middle of the road vote since she feels like she's got the nomination wrapped up. Although her disapproval rating is overwhelming negative.
If she wins the Democratic nomination, she is likely toast in the main election.
2007-08-22 06:40:13 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Hillary is a big establishment supporter and a smart politician. She can count on the liberal vote and doesn't need to stand up against the war.
Vote Green!
2007-08-22 06:20:27 · answer #8 · answered by Skeptic 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
No. She thinks she already has the Democratic nomination sewn up, so she doesn't have to play to her base. Now she's trying to move to the middle instead of being seen as far right.
2007-08-22 06:18:45 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, she is merely triangulating. As for links, I suggest the answerer review the several hundred questions posed on YA yesterday after her thighness make the comment.
2007-08-22 06:22:51 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
She's turning on her own philosophy. In other words, she's telling the truth for a change.
2007-08-22 06:29:41 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋