http://games.espn.go.com/nba/features/traderesult?players=614~2991~988~434~2798~2382~3053~841~1720~592~3238&teams=26~14~14~14~14~21~21~21~26~6~6&te=&cash=6:21
2007-08-22 06:00:58 · 16 answers · asked by Tweak 3 in Sports ➔ Basketball
wow, cool trade.
I think it's a good trade for the Heat, out going an old Shaq and getting a lot of young talents.
2007-08-22 06:32:10 · answer #1 · answered by Ling T 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
This trade doesn't make sense for three major reasons:
1. Why would the Suns trade away the MVP of the league for a shoot first backup point guard (Harris), a down-side starting PG (Terry), and an end of the bench player (Pops)?
2. Why would the Jazz give away so much to get an addled, old Shaq? Deron is the next coming of Stockton, so unless you can prove that Steve Logan is the next Maravich, this is a no go for sure.
3. I don't think that the AK trade to Miami will fit into the plan of Coach Riley. Riles wants to win a championship, and a backcourt of Wade and Deron with no offensive presence in the frontcourt does not bode well for a march to the Finals.
Overall...creative, but really illogical.
3.
2007-08-22 06:11:32 · answer #2 · answered by chuckna21 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The Miami Heat would be the only team that would love this trade. They would trade away Shaq for Deron Williams and Andre Kirilenko any day, but the Utah would never even think about letting Williams go. The Suns would also stay out of any talks of letting Nash go. The Mavs would also never move Harris. So at the end of the day, it would only be a funny rumor.
Anyways, it looks like it could just be two regular trades, Mavs to Suns and Utah to Miami. Its pointless to make it a four team trade when no player goes to a third team.
2007-08-25 23:43:17 · answer #3 · answered by eddie 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Utah gets the worst end of this deal and Miami gets the best.
Utah gives up a future 20 points, 10 assists guy in Deron Williams and a versatile forward in Andrei Kirilenko for an overpaid, often injured center who can be dominant on occasion as long as he is paired with a superstar guard.
Miami gets Deron Williams, Andrei Kirilenko, and a young player in Ronnie Brewer. They give up their highest paid player to help them with their salary cap issues. Miami would have a championship lineup, especially in the East.
PG - Williams, SG - Wade, SF - Walker, PF - Kirilenko, and C - Mourning
Miami gets the best end, followed with a tie by Dallas and Phoenix, then Utah.
2007-08-22 09:56:32 · answer #4 · answered by Mesfin I 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
lol! Yea, the trade could work but the Suns will not get rid of Nash right now and Shaq wouldn't go to Utah no matter how much ther paid him!
Come to RootZoo for smart sports talk. Head on over and ask this question there, you’ll get the best responses. ï
http://www.rootzoo.com
_
2007-08-22 06:06:35 · answer #5 · answered by sportsta 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
suns and jazz get screwed nash is the best point guard and deron williams is pretty much the second or third best point guard and will be the best in a couple years horrible trade. right now williams alone is worth more than shaq hes to old
2007-08-22 07:36:36 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Phoenix needs Terry like they need a hole in the head.
Utah needs Shaq like they need a hole in the head
Neither would give up nash, AK or Deron. Dream on.
2007-08-22 06:06:45 · answer #7 · answered by alwaysmoose 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Jazz will trade the best point guard in the playoff for a aging O'neal, how could it be a good traded asshole
2007-08-22 06:07:25 · answer #8 · answered by Ronnie 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
bad trade. the jazz aren't going to shake up their team and trade deron williams. they're starting to have success. shaq is just old and big. he isn't the dominant force he used to be. i don't know about the suns and mavs trading.
2007-08-22 06:46:27 · answer #9 · answered by Matt 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, these questions are stupid and ive never seen a good trade
Shaq has a no trade clause and he would never go to a city that is commercially small
2007-08-22 06:09:24 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋