I would no more expect Petraeus' name on Bush's sham of a report than I'd expect Bush's to appear on anything which told the truth. There has to be a time a general stands by his troops.
2007-08-22 21:51:56
·
answer #1
·
answered by Fr. Al 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
Amazing how liberals can try to discredit a report before it is even written. Even if the report is bad they will say it is not bad enough and a conspiracy. Any wonder why the liberal congress has the lowest rating in history and it is still getting lower. It must be Bush's fault.
2007-08-22 12:34:21
·
answer #2
·
answered by Bleh! 6
·
1⤊
2⤋
Petraeus will do as he is told. The White House is writing the report.
2007-08-22 12:26:53
·
answer #3
·
answered by tribeca_belle 7
·
2⤊
2⤋
I don't know enough about the situation in Iraq to give an informed opinion.
2007-08-22 13:03:41
·
answer #4
·
answered by johnandeileen2000 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
i think theres a report coming soon so i expect he has some role in it since hes the general
2007-08-22 12:24:02
·
answer #5
·
answered by secretservice 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
It will be another Bully Bush snow job, they're in their last throes, mission almost accomplished, we've almost found that WMD..
2007-08-22 12:28:48
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
3⤋
Of course he will..He is not an anonymous softie liberal that send out half truths
2007-08-22 12:23:49
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
5⤋
Yes he'll put his name on it, he's a bush yes man.
2007-08-22 12:27:02
·
answer #8
·
answered by ? 6
·
2⤊
4⤋
I smell a liberal. A report is not even written and you are making up things to dis the President and the military. No thanks.
2007-08-22 12:23:03
·
answer #9
·
answered by regerugged 7
·
2⤊
6⤋
sure, whatever
2007-08-25 18:03:26
·
answer #10
·
answered by passion2share 4
·
0⤊
0⤋