Endangered animals or children in third world nations and why?
I say endangered animals because they will do extinct otherwise whereas third world nations are spitting out more babies than what's good for them.
I would LOVE to help both, but if I HAD to choose...I say animals.
2007-08-22 05:17:11 · 7 answers · asked by Megegie 5 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Polls & Surveys
It's hard to choose...
i can't stand to think about all those children suffering...
so i'd have to say children, as much as i love animals.
2007-08-22 05:20:27 · answer #1 · answered by ClaireBear 3 · 3⤊ 0⤋
i agree with you because with out animals that chart with one animal eating another would totally get ruined and there already enough humans in the world. we've already scewed up the chain enough just for animals fur and such. might as well not make it worse.
2007-08-22 12:23:32 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
the animals
2007-08-22 12:23:11 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 0⤋
And just "how" would you help animals? By changing their nature and protecting them from other "animals"? I would have liked to see all of you that chose animals to have been around when dinosaurs walked the earth and were endangered! Sweet but "Duh"!
2007-08-22 12:49:18 · answer #4 · answered by Daddy 6 · 1⤊ 2⤋
How could anyone say that! I really hope you're joking...
I'm an animal lover, but kids are far more important.
2007-08-22 12:25:25 · answer #5 · answered by Bog woppit. 7 · 1⤊ 2⤋
I agree, animals. Once their gone, that's it.
2007-08-22 12:25:29 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
the humans. theyre far more important than animals.
2007-08-22 12:20:51 · answer #7 · answered by Eve 7 · 1⤊ 5⤋