He wouldn't be my first choice, But I'd consider voting for him. At least he'd be more qualified and level headed than any of the democratic candidates.
The Clinton's screwed up the country enough last time. Even staying out of the economic argument, think on this:
Clinton was offered Bin Laden on a silver platter(he was already wanted for other terrorist acts) but did nothing.
Clinton gave nuclear capabilities to the North Korean regime.
Things would be quite different if just these two things were handled better.
just say no to Hillary !!!
2007-08-22 04:32:59
·
answer #1
·
answered by Captain Jack ® 7
·
0⤊
2⤋
Newt Gingrich is a phd, a historian, a statesmen, a former speaker of the house, a writer and a thoroughly experienced politician.
All the ingredients you need to fail in a presidential bid.
What the country needs is an inspirational president that will unite us against threats to our way of life coming from terrorists, Russians, Liberals, Chinese, North Koreans, OPEC, and the EU.
While sitting through a lecture from Newt Gingrich may expose you to intelligent ideas, important information and simple logic, most Americans would be bored to tears.
So the answer to your question is NO. Newt will not and should not be president.
We are better off with him affecting the debate with questions on real issues from the sidelines rather than from Youtube, Brit Hume or Wolf Blitzer.
2007-08-22 04:25:05
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
Sure, just think of the wonderful family Christmas we could have, all three of his wives could be there.
At least his first wife, his former high school teacher, the one he divorced while she was in the hospital for a hysterectomy, would have a good meal, shes been living on church charity.
I don't know if Wife 2 is speaking to Wife 3, that was a nasty bit, him making it with 3 while 2 was still married to him.
Any man who can pull that off, can star with Dick Morris, caught sucking the toes of a prostitute and now starring on FOX news. Oh wait, he already does. Along with a couple of other felons.
2007-08-22 04:21:01
·
answer #3
·
answered by justa 7
·
3⤊
1⤋
Honestly no. Newt is great at finding fault with everything in government, but the fault stops before it gets to himself.
2007-08-22 04:21:11
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
0⤋
I am a Republican, and I would not want him as president. He is a twit, and I never understood why he was made Speaker of the House.
I can see I am not alone on this, so if Yahoo still allowed thumbs down for questions, you would probably have some too.
2007-08-22 04:15:24
·
answer #5
·
answered by Sparkles 7
·
2⤊
2⤋
If you like this one you'd love Newt. He is the quintessential neocon.
2007-08-22 04:50:12
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Newtie couldn't hack it in the Senate, why would anybody think he might even make a fair President? Just another Bush!!!!
2007-08-22 04:18:07
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
i like newt and would vote for him
he seems to be a straight shooter
unlike edwards who makes me physically ill when I hear him speak
2007-08-22 04:19:59
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
3⤋
i believe that he would make a really good president with his experience and knowledge. he has learned a lot from his mistakes but he knows that he would have too much baggage to run. it is sad for we lose a lot of expertise that could prove valuable.
2007-08-22 04:16:52
·
answer #9
·
answered by ? 7
·
2⤊
3⤋
Good Lord NO!
2007-08-22 04:27:25
·
answer #10
·
answered by gone 7
·
2⤊
0⤋