"Why isn't birth control a priority? Sex is a part of student development and identity development theory."
"identity development theory?" What is that? And its a theory? How is that persuasive?
"Student development?" I thought learning was, and not the best way to have sex.
As you may see, I obviously disagree with that statement. What say you?
As you can see, i o
2007-08-22 03:40:41 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
first respondant, i do understand it. But the identity development theory is so vague, i mean, i am willing to bet there are many of these theories, yet, this person only states it generally, and I highly doubt that all involve students having sex.
2007-08-22 03:47:01 · update #1
Sex is an instinct, a perfectly normal human instict. It is completely normal. It is not dirty, smutty or anything else. God you Cons are so repressed.
You can't stop people from having sex but you can control unwanted pregnancy.
2007-08-22 03:50:01 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 6⤋
"Why isn't birth control a priority? Sex is a part of student development and identity development theory."
I disagree with the statement completely. Sex is not required for a young adult to "find themselves", EDUCATION and LIFE EXPERIENCE ARE.
Abstinence has to be taught as the primary, most reliable, and socially/morally acceptable way to prevent pregnancy and STDs,.. I will agree with the conservatives on that.
However, If young adults choose NOT to abstain, then they have to be taught that using birth control is the only other acceptable means to be responsible for ones' body.
THIS EDUCATION NEEDS TO START AT HOME.
It is the parents' job to instill values and morals in children so they can make the right decision regarding their bodies.... not the schools or the government.
2007-08-22 04:01:00 · answer #2 · answered by tiny Valkyrie 7 · 2⤊ 2⤋
I'm curious as to why you didn't send an email.
However, when one studies higher education as a degree program or works in higher education they often look to student development theory to understand how a student will develop as a lot happens between 18-22 in a student's life and it relates to how they behave in college and how to best support students in high stress and learning who they are. I'm sure you remember making a lot of mistakes in your early twenties and late teens regarding relationships, finance, etc.
However, if you're curious about student development theory I would suggest heading to a library to study. Good places to start include Arthur Chickering's Psychosocial Theory of Student Development and William Perry's Cognitive Theory of Student Development
2007-08-22 03:47:51 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 2⤋
-the 1st observed action picture is without doubt one in all of the properly-crafted thrillers of the final ten years (havent seen it) -a great majority of mob/ mafia video clips are overrated (possibly yet i like them) -the top of Inception replaced into merely gimmicky so as that human beings could communicate approximately it greater, and greater could see it (i enjoyed it lots yet of direction they wanted to create buzz) -Jackie Brown is the worst (or weakest) action picture directed by ability of Quentin Tarantino (havent seen it) -Chris Columbus' in hassle-free terms stable action picture is residing house on my own (disagree, mrs doubtfire, harry potter a million) -That action sequels are worse than horror sequels (no opinion) -Citizen Kane is the only terrific action picture of all time (disagree) -Schindler's checklist is the terrific action picture bearing directly to the Holocaust ( agree) -Ignoring all of the emo-stuff in Spiderman 3, it replaced into merely as, or practically as stable because of the fact the previous ones (hey i presumed SM3 replaced into badass) -The Narrater (in combat club) is merely as much as a eye-catching character as Tyler Durden (agree yet i think of Durden is greater iconic
2016-10-16 11:23:41 · answer #4 · answered by starcher 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No!
We need to be teaching ABC's and 123"s not STD's.
For the last million years or so,humans have managed to learn about sex without government help.
2007-08-22 03:59:21 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
Because birth control is only treating the symptom...it doesn't address the problem. Birth control is available to anyone who calls their doctor or makes a trip to the free clinic...that issue has been solved. Now about all those people having sex with stranger's and multiple partners while ignoring the preventative measures and education that is readily available....
2007-08-22 03:47:38 · answer #6 · answered by Erinyes 6 · 3⤊ 4⤋
The United States has one of the highest instances of teen pregnancy and abortion of all of the developed countries. In other developed countries, sex education is part of basic education and contraception is made available.
I think it is in our best interests to address the issue realistically without hiding behind outdated, ineffective concepts of sexuality.
2007-08-22 03:49:04 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 3⤋
Maybe they meant that it's the tax payer's responsibility to assure developmental booty calls..... And now I'm thinking that maybe I should have read ALL of that packet they gave me when I enrolled in school years ago LOL
2007-08-22 04:43:07 · answer #8 · answered by That Guy Over There 4 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Yep, I disagree also, sex ed is the obligation of the parents.
Liberals just use the birth control issue to promote more and more unlimited sex.
Not good.
2007-08-22 03:49:03 · answer #9 · answered by Jeremiah Johnson 7 7 · 6⤊ 3⤋
Yeah, when I read that on my question I laughed. some liberals are so clueless....it's scary.
I guess the chance to get STDs is 'a part of student development and identity development theory'.
Is that another part of liberal 'intelligence'?
2007-08-22 03:46:49 · answer #10 · answered by Still Beautifully Conservative 5 · 3⤊ 5⤋