Is the usage of the term "as" in the following statements correct?

Question

1. You are as part as wholes include you.
2. You are as whole as parts compose you.
3. You are as equivalence as differences distinguish you.
4. You are as uniquness as equivalences equate you.
5. You are as limit as links link you.
6. You are as link as limits limit you.
7. You are as influence as sensations sense you.
8. You are as sensation as influences influence you.
9. You are as origin as derivatives inherit you.
10. You are as derivative as origins originate you.
11. You are as rule as conditions condition you.
12. You are as condition as rules rule you.
13. You are as intent as fulfillments fulfill you.
14. You are as fulfillment as intents intend you.

Is the usage of the term "as" in the above statements correct?

Answer 1

13 is the only one that even sounds remotely correct.

Answer 2

the two! the 1st one is amazingly clean and so the solutions too help the 1st one. the 2d is somewhat precis. some time in the past, there grew to become right into a juggling of questions with "identities" by skill of the comparable asker! This 2d one is an identical 'dig' on the very comparable thought, wherein ever form the "residences" of the minds of the answerers has chosen to define or extremely 'afforded' the Definition! With a special merchandise, how can its residences be defined, without regarding a assessment (a minimum of as a assessment, or a contradistinction), is the venture posed by skill of the 2d! The very term "residences" presupposes some form of generalisation, interior the traditional sense of the term. The words needed to define a 'assets' is drawn out of its 'time-honored utilization sense' to make it universally understood!

Answer 3

'as' is one of the few poly or multiple word operators; 'as' is used in description intended to convey experiences with subjects in action at the same time, e.g. as b' was b'ing, c' was c'ing, i.e. b' and c' are doing or were doing something in the same duration of time, 'at the same time'. 'as' is also (and) used for metaphorical analogical similarities e.g. your mind rises as the dawning sun rises to view on the horizon.

I think you are using 'as' in a third utility value for making synonym....

'1. You are as part as wholes include you.' I include you in a definition for something if I identify you are part for something.

''2. You are as whole as parts compose you.'

The discernment for whole is a sensory perception phenomena first, then an abstract phenomena.

''3. You are as equivalence as differences distinguish you.'' Not equivalence, identified.

''4. You are as uniqueness as equivalences equate you.'' No, as a person differentiates you are percieve as unique (not necessarily though).
''5. You are as limit as links link you.''
''6. You are as link as limits limit you.''
''7. You are as influence as sensations sense you.''
''8. You are as sensation as influences influence you.''
''9. You are as origin as derivatives inherit you.'
''10. You are as derivative as origins originate you.''
''11. You are as rule as conditions condition you.''
12. You are as condition as rules rule you.''
13. You are as intent as fulfillments fulfill you.''
14. You are as fulfillment as intents intend you.''

You are using sematic of a dictionary that is not published from a publishing company and is therefore not common for public usage. Instead of 'you', use 'I' and rewrite. Would THAT be grammatically correct? I say no.

The Will is positive, the Judgment is negative.

Answer 4

Yes... as correct as possible.....my comment is limited to the grammatical aspect, the meaning they convey or not is another matter.