Was the American Government (i.e- Bush's people) really behind september/11 ?

Question

I was just watching ''9/11 Coincidences'' on youtube. Is it true ?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=puWqNJI8Mjo&NR=1

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b5JVYTxjmdc&mode=related&search=

Answer 1

keep watching more documentaries and doing more research for yourself, don't stop there, the evidence is overwhelming. Don't believe anyone, see for yourself.

Answer 2

I believe that rogue elements of our government, as well as several others, played a role. However, it is overly simplistic to say that "the government did it." That seems to imply that they took a vote on it on Capital Hill or something. Only a real investigation, not one like the 9/11 commission - where everything was built around a pre-determined conclusion - will actually shed some light on the players involved. Pakistan and Saudi Arabia are definitely keys to a lot of it. Not coincidentally, these are the two countries we allied most closely with after 9/11. I guess it was just a lucky break that Pakistani intelligence chief Mahmood Ahmed, who also just happened to be the man who ordered the wiring of $100,000 to Mohammed Atta, was already in Washington during the week of 9/11, and was able to get a head start working on the new security partnership immediately after the attacks. Its all on the public record. You won't see Popular Mechanics or the History Channel tackling that one any time soon. Won't matter to the borderline retards who seem to post on Yahoo Answers so frequently. More full of crap than the JFK conspiracists? You have to be really gullible to think that Oswald acted alone, especially in light of the two major university forensics studies that have shattered the single bullet theory, not to mention the mountains of other evidence. Sorry Vincent Bugliosi. Bad timing. But then again you probably still believe that the Spanish blew up the Maine and that the North Vietnamese actually attacked us at the Gulf of Tonkin. Got history?

http://abcnews.go.com/US/story?id=92662&page=1

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Northwoods - I'm not always a big Wikipedia fan, but you can link the actual documents there.

Answer 3

I don't know how many conspiracy documentaries there are, I've watched like two different ones. They all need a good thorough fact check, I will say that because they are serious claims.

I do believe there needs to be another extremely thorough investigation into the events because the 9/11 commission and report was totally inadequate and because there are MANY unanswered questions. These conspiracies need to be adressed head-on by an objective and independent investigation and conspiracies - if any - need to be exposed.

Answer 4

since the beginning of any government, (romans ex) there have been people who have preferred to make acquisations like this to cast a shadow of a doubt on the current government. When things are convenient people grab on to these ideas to come up with an explanation for themselves. I disagree with a war in iraq but the idea of the us government killing its own citezens is proposterous, just like the jfk nuts who i suppose need something to grab onto in there life, or the crazys who go stand in the desert to watch ufos. They can easily spread propoganda to other well wishers and a certain uneducated, easily swayed percentage of the population will follow them and do everything to upheave what they conveniantly believe is true. And well I disagree with Bush, some fat sack of crap like micheal moore (where all this seems to stem from) is not the kind of joke who the average intelligent mind will follow. If things were convenient Micheal Moores films could make Clinton look just as bad as Bush.
You must be very dillegent and responsible when it comes to the kind of propoganda you follow, this is our responsibility as voters in a free society, if the conspiracy theory people who will bite onto anything made up the large percentage of the votes, we would have lost our great countries to suspicions and blame which have brought down other great countries in the past. It is your duty to gather information and be very desicive when deciding what is true and what is not, from cnn to the micheal moores of the world.

Answer 5

It's called "9/11 Coincidences" for a reason. If it were true, it'd be called "9/11 facts".

Answer 6

It was the Smoking Man. He killed JFK and Martin Luther King, rigged the 1980 Winter Olympics, and kept the Buffalo Bills from ever winning a Super Bowl.

In truth, those 9/11 conspiracies are more full of crap than the JFK conspiracy nuts. Either they are incredibly stupid or extremely insane. Do you believe what stupid, crazy people say?

Answer 7

Of course not. With him being so unpopular and hated by the commucrats, someone would surely have spilled the beans by now. And just imagine how much money that information would be worth. I like him, but if I knew something and they offered me some money, he would be on his way to Leavenworth right now.

Answer 8

hahhaha what a tripp cuz it aint troo evene though how much everyone hates bush bush isnt behind 9/11..... thats ridiculus and down right slander

Answer 9

It's ridiculous, if they were behind it, they would have made the hijackers Iraqis. At least a couple of the 19 would have been Iraqis if the Bushies were behind it.

Answer 10

I think it is your wisful thinking! Read some books and article in internet, try to check some answers in Google answers.

Answer 11

Do you really think they are competent enough to pull off the biggest conspiracy of all time?