Do the current views of life originating on a giant slushy comet imply desperation on the part of evolutionist

Question

SInce astro physisists in the UK claim that life is
1000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 less likely to occur on earth than on a slushy comet why wouln't they seriously consider the possibilty God created life on earth instead of resorting to life being made on a giant slushy and crashing on earth?

see Scientific Calculations 'Prove' Life Came From A Comet

http://www.livescience.com/space/scienceastronomy/070816_life_comets.html

Answer 1

That study has been discredited due to some assumptions they have made.

See, scientists don't like to make assumptions, like god did ____ because the exact method is yet to be understood.

Oh how you misunderstand evolution (which actually has nothing to do with your question, it's actually about abiogenesis).

Answer 2

in case you're bearing on the abiogenesis experience in the worldwide, i'm uncertain there is any actual thank you to tell at this element the place precisely it got here approximately. we are in a position to reproduction the approach, and characteristic a incredibly respectable information of Earth's background, yet we don't comprehend the place or while precisely the 1st animate molecules got here approximately. It replaced into someplace between 3.5-4 billion years in the past.

Answer 3

comets demonstrably exist. the same cannot be said of god. thus, the comet hypothesis has obvious advantages from a scientific point of view. i have no idea how they calculate that probability though, i don't feel the need to blindly believe what they say. i have no idea why you think that this would be a sign of desperation. they are investigating a possibility, that is all.

Answer 4

Um life didn't come FROM the comet, but it's said to have sparked it. Not to mention, the UK is behind in science compared to the US.

I think it's desperation to say that something made us in seconds and placed us here just to be tempted, to see if we could get into heaven. Sick game.

Answer 5

Mayby lack of any evidence whatsoever for god? Wadayathink? No reason to seariously consider the possibility god created life any more than there is reason to believe that Santa and the tooth fairy hooked up to begin it all.

Answer 6

Because we have no need of that hypothesis. Occam's Razor slices it away. Oh, it still exists as a 'possibility'... it's just that as far as possibilities go, it is so remote, miniscule and unlikely (from the logical and rational point of view) as to be laughable.

Think about it (I know that's asking a lot)... basically, your taking the position: "This science stuff is too hard... it makes my head hurt. Forget about it. Just say 'It's magic... god did it'."

Thankfully, not everybody is as lame as that.

Answer 7

Neither are provable by any means. No one in the scientific community is accepting that theory as fact.
You are stupid for the mere fact that you would use this word, "evolutionist"

Answer 8

No it merely proves that somebody is using their brains. There have been numerous studies that prove the use it or lose it effect applies to intelligence. Better to be laughed at than brain dead.

Answer 9

Scientists are very close to creating life from nothing right now. Any one can make life. God isn't special, he is a bytch

Answer 10

It only adds an extra layer, is doesn't answer anything.

That and there is a new theory to biogenesis every year or so, I tire of them.