If theists already state that god is outside of anything natural, and science cannot disprove it.?

Question

Then why do some even bother asking atheists to disprove god, or invite atheist speakers to debate?

Nothing an atheist scientist could say would alter the fact that they state that god is outside of nature, and the rules do not apply to their god.

For example (most arguments go like this)

The immovable mover...
God pre-existed and created the universe. He just always existed. You cannot apply natural physiology to him.

Answer 1

This reminds me of the chapter where Carl Sagan talks about the dragon in his garage in "The Demon-Haunted World" -- if god is invisible, intangible, exists outside of time and space, and has no measurable or reproducible effect on the material world, what exactly does it mean to say "God exists"; and how does a universe with such an ineffectual god differ from one with no god at all?

Answer 2

Don't count science out, we're used to playing with a handicap. Look at the Renaissance following the dark ages. We can disprove God, it'll just take a whole lot of research, and a great deal of time. And you know, by that time, it'll hardly matter because with all of the advancements along the way, there will be so much evidence contrary to any existing theological doctrine that hardly anybody but the most persistent will continue to believe.

Answer 3

there is not any Mr impressive. There are, even though, cults. each faith is a cult. all of them declare to be the only suited hyperlink to 'Mr impressive'. all of them use the comparable approaches, get 'em on an identical time as they're very youthful, and start up up the preparation. you are able to inspect each, see their classes. And word how they use rote preparation - the repetitive and reinforcing preparation.. good day - the army & all the different militia clothing do the comparable - rote prepare the troops. till it turns into an factor to you. the fact of this universe we live interior of - is easily different. And 4 hundred years in the past, technological awareness lit a surprising mild, of reason & awareness. It swept the planet, grew to become into many times used as 'the enlightenment'. seem it up. the element is - those cults are additionally utilized by skill of the corporate syndicate that runs the gadget we are fairly lots forced to stay under. It wasn't constantly this type. back as quickly as we had a President that needed education, technological awareness and actual well being for everyone, and he started out the Peace Corps. however the corporate syndicate needed extra - consistent - Wars. something is history..

Answer 4

The argument actually goes like his:

(1) Everything that exists contingently has a reason for its existence.
(2) The universe exists contingently.
Therefore:
(3) The universe has a reason for its existence.
(4) If the universe has a reason for its existence then that reason is God.
Therefore:
(5) God exists.

HTH

Charles

Answer 5

Ah, yes. They start with the premise that an "actual infinite" cannot exist, so the universe must have had a beginning, and therefore a cause - and "God" must be that Cause. So...what caused God? Well, He's the exception to the rule. It's a cute trick, but it only satisfies people who want to be satisfied by it.

Answer 6

Probably because atheist are like Christians, they'll take the opportunity to preach anytime they're given a chance.

I don't understand why either side can pretend they know more than the other.

It's like PC and Mac fighting over who has the best computer hardware, they have two different philosophies and standards. I'm partial to PC since it was my first computer and it's still working.

Answer 7

You have the basic argument down. To bad for the argument that a God outside of this universe's space and time would have no way of interacting with it. In effect, God would not exist.

Answer 8

Christians will always find an excuse for God. Even if it's "God had a greater plan for destroying all the people in the world/the poverty in Africa/wars/bad things happening to good people. We cannot possibly comprehend this. Now go worship evil God."

Answer 9

Ditto the Reverend Soleil.

"If god is invisible, intangible, exists outside of time and space, and has no measurable or reproducible effect on the material world, what exactly does it mean to say "God exists"; and how does a universe with such an ineffectual god differ from one with no god at all?" Carl Sagan

Answer 10

Fortunately the burden of proof is not to disprove god but to prove that he exists. We're still waiting for deists to design an experiment to prove their hypothesis.