It wasn't for me! But I am perfectly pleased with my beautiful little girl!
2007-08-21 01:25:04
·
answer #1
·
answered by Summer 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
It wasn't accurate with my first child. It said boy and we had a beautiful little girl! This time around I cannot yet prove that it is wrong, the baby has not been born yet, but it's saying boy again and it's been confirmed several times that she is another beautiful girl!
Not accurate but fun anyway! BTW I would be interested in knowing what site you are using for your source. I have always used http://www.thelaboroflove.com/chart/pred.html
2007-08-21 01:30:17
·
answer #2
·
answered by Busy Mommy of 3 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Well I've looked on a couple of site and it's crazy. One site says at when the baby is born which means I'll have a girl, and other sites say age at conception which means i'll have a boy!
So Confused! But I'll love my child what ever gender it may be.
2007-08-21 01:39:17
·
answer #3
·
answered by Kayleigh + Alexandra 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
It was wrong for my daughter (should have been a boy) but correct for my son. Very eerie chart but I know more people it has been correct for than incorrect.
2007-08-21 01:48:21
·
answer #4
·
answered by Cindy; mum to 3 monkeys! 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
It was correct for me all 3 times & for a lot of others I know. It's pretty weird.
2007-08-21 05:18:59
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
it was accurate for all 3 of mine :)
2007-08-21 19:41:57
·
answer #6
·
answered by chicanaGirl 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
For me it got a 1 outta 2. It was right with my first son but it was wrong with my second son...
2007-08-21 09:53:39
·
answer #7
·
answered by Brandi 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
lol, it was pretty amazing! It was accurate for all my children and my mother's as well
2007-08-21 01:06:30
·
answer #8
·
answered by sweet girl 3
·
2⤊
0⤋
right with all 3 of mine!
2007-08-21 02:49:19
·
answer #9
·
answered by nomorebabieshaha 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
right on both accounts
2007-08-23 02:14:14
·
answer #10
·
answered by madiesmum 6
·
1⤊
0⤋