creationist?

Question

if evolution is proven to be not able to create human , earth is onli a few thousand years old.

does that means that the biblical god is true?

biblical earth is onli 6000~10k years old

Answer 1

The age of the cosmos doesn't depend on evolultion. Scientists have about 10 different lines of evidence they use to determine the age of the earth, and all of these point to a very ancient world.
I'll put a link down below to a place you can get more information.

Answer 2

No it doesn't prove that the biblical God is true. It just proves that the bible, which claims to be the revelation from the biblical God, is accurate and therefore deserves credibility.
To prove that the biblical God is true would be a totally different argument and this is the way I would argue assumming the two facts you're giving me:a)evolution is not true b)earth is just a few thousand years old. I would argue this way.
1)Things either evolved or they were created. If they didn't evolve then they were created. Who could create a universe. You call Him what you want, I call Him God.
2)God is up there and we are down here. If we are going to know anything about Him it's because He chooses to reveal Himself to us and not the other way around. Therefore, you don't need reason to know about God, what you need is revelation.
3)All the Holy books(which claim to be revelations from God)
contradict each other and they all say they are coming from God.
4)The law of non-contradiction says one of 2 things:a)either one of those books are true and the others are false or b)They're all false.
5)If you look at archeology about half of the artifacts they find have to do with religion(they find burials grounds that are religious in nature, they find temple areas, all cultures and all the different empires had some kind of a religion....). Also, man cannot do away with religion. Communism tried to eliminate christianity and all religion. Lenin said that religion was the opiate of the people. He outlawed it and persecuted anyone who practiced religion. Yet Communism could not conquer religion. It eventually conquered communism. Man just seems to have an innate desire to know about God. He seems to have been created that way.
6) It doesn't make sense that God would create man with a desire to know about Him but never leave any revelation of Himself. Therefore, I don't believe that they are all false.
7)Therefore, one of them must be true. Which one?
8)I would rule out all the eastern religions because they are all Pantheistic and Pantheism says that the universe is eternal. The big bang theory has proven that wrong. The big bang says that the universe had a beginning, namely, the big bang.
9)That leaves 3 religions:1)christianity 2)Judaism 3)islam
10)If God wanted everyone to know which revelation was His revelation, He certainly would put His signature on the correct Holy book.
Finally,
11) The Bible has the signature of God attached to it in many ways. One of those ways is Bible prophecy. The old testament has 333 prophecies about the first coming of Jesus Christ and 456 specific details about his life(all written between 400 and 2200 years before he was born). The 4 gospels in the new testament(Mathew, Mark, Luke & John) tell the story of Jesus. Had those 4 gospel writers chosen to not write their gospels, we could still have re-created the whole life of Christ just from the old testament(all written before he was born). In fact, that is how the christians preached the gospel in the first 20-30 years after the death of Christ. They preached it from the old testament because the new testament was in the process of being written. The story of Christ is all there in the Old Testament including some details about His life that are not even mentioned in the New Testament. Man sees history like a person sees the Rose Parade sitting in the stands. The floats that have already gone by him are like the past. The floats in front of him are like the present. The floats still coming are like the future. These prophets in the old testament who wrote about Jesus Christ seemed to be able to see history the way you would see the Rose Parade from a helicopter. They seemed to be able to see the end from the beginning. That tells me that though they were writing these things down the info was not ultimately coming from them but from a higher source because man simply doesn't see history that way. Also, the bible has amazing knowledge about many scientific principals long before these principals were discovered. Seventeen times in the old testament the bible says that God is "stretching the heavens". For thousands of years bible scholar struggled with what that could possibly mean. Then in 1929 Edwin Hubble discovered that the universe was expanding. The bible told us that long ago.
No other religion or Holy Book has this kind of knowledge. All this tells me that these prophets in both the old and new testament were not nutcases but true prophets of God.
12)Therefore, the bible is the true revelation from God which means the biblical God(which the bible revaels) is the true God.

Answer 3

"No" - not necessarily ! There is nothing stated within the pages of the Holy Bible claiming, that the earth is only 6,000 years old. This is purely, conjecture based in assumption.
Further; Evolution has been proven to be a non-plausible theory. Check-out Center for Science & Culture (CSC)
at: www.dissentfromdarwin.org - herein, you will find dozens of Scientists from world-famous , higher institutes of learning, supplying both, scientific proof and a list of names of those Scientists, who disagree entirely with Darwin and his theory.

Answer 4

why does it mean the earth is only a few thousand years old? The conclusion does not lead from the statement, just as your question does not lead from anything. Just a series of non sequiteurs

Answer 5

"Evolution has been proven to be a non-plausible theory"

ROTFLMAO!

Yeah, right. Most of those "esteemed" scientists are commenting on work out of their fields and not one of them has ever published a single paper in a peer-reviewed journal disproving the slightest aspect of evolution.

Answer 6

earth is older than a few thousand years old, even if evolution is real or not, which it is no matter how much anyone wants it not to be.

Answer 7

no


http://www.atheists-online.com/store.asp?shop=00600#1

Answer 8

No, no more than the reverse would be true.
It would provide evidence, but not proof.