If there is actual proofs and accounts that Darwin denied his own theories of evolution....?

Question

Why are so many ppl so into it, also all evolutionists say they want theories of Creationism to be proved true, but if I gave you evidence of my theory, (which is what they are, theories, since I just trust God anyway and dont worry about where I came from) you would just deny it immediately. So I challenge you to google "findings" of Noah's Ark on the Top of Mt. Ararat. To be honest there is no irrespudible proof that this is or isn't Noah's Ark, since most of it is well decayed, but there is proof that your so called "Nebraska Man" is an extinct pig.

Answer 1

No. There is nothing but one old woman's claims (a woman who had met Darwin for 10 minutes a few months before he died and Darwin didn't really speak to her... she pretty much attacked him for his scientific work and later wrote that he recanted). There is absolutely nothing to back up this woman's claims.

a coherent group of general propositions used as principles of explanation for a class of phenomena: Einstein's theory of relativity.

Now with that definition of theory, you would be hard pressed to come up with actual evidence that mankind lived with dinosaurs or that Noah had a T-Rex on the ark - to which there are 5 sites (not one) that they claim Could be where the ark is. The site you might be talking about is most likely the rock formation they found from Above the site (which, from the point they are talking about, looks like a decaying boat... but it's a rock). The reason they even searched there was because a man claimed he found scrolls inside of the ark which held biblical scriptures (there is NO evidence the Hebrews were writing Anything at that time... we have no writings till they were slaves in Babylon)... these "scriptures" have proven to be false... forgeries, the paper made to look like old papyrus (animal skins were usually used during that time... papyrus would have been in Egypt and a rare commodity)

The Nebraska man... that's one point. What about Lucy????????

Answer 2

Darwin could have denied that gravity exists. That wouldn't make the slightest difference to the existence of gravity.
Darwin was not a prophet, he was a scientist. You are mixing things up. You can deny all you want that evolution exits, won't make any difference either.
Noahs Ark is extremely doubtful and disputed, even if proof would be found that it was a ship additional proof that it was Noah's is extremely unlikely ever to emerge (shouldn't actually the tallest mountain on earth be the one Noah landed? Ararat definitely doesn't qualify as that.).

In addition saying "evolution is just a theory" goes right against creationist websites. If you don't believe me check here:
http://www.creationontheweb.com/content/view/2996

Answer 3

There is no such proof. None. Zero. Zip.

Have you even read any of Darwin's writings?

As for Noah's Ark, the burden of proof is on anyone who claims that it is, in fact, the ark.

No serious or reputable scientists ever held up the so called Nebraska Man as a descendant of humans so it's completely irrelevant. If you;re going to try and make arguments against evolution, argue based on the facts and not on anecdotal oddities. Tell us why the work and the conclusions of the leaky family gathered over decades are invalid.

Answer 4

Did you take your meds today?


First, there is no proof that Darwin denied the theory of evolution. His own family members, who were devout Christians, stated absolutely that he did not, and they were the ones with him when he died.


I have looked at the 'arks' found on Ararat. All those big boat shapes have been shown to be rock formations.


Now why don't you go away and come back when you have some scientific based evidence that disproves evolution.

Answer 5

There are numerous conflicting accounts of Darwin's deathbed recantation. None are credible, and none mean anything since Darwin published a year after Alfred Russel Wallace, a Christian who did not recant. If Einstein recanted, Relativity would still hold.

Nebraska man was hailed in the popular press, before the truth was determined by expert scientists, not by Creationists.

Answer 6

You see Darwin made some statements based on the information that he had. You have to realize how different things were 100 years ago. Darwin stated that there were some gaps in the fossil record but that's because he didn't have the chance to search and find the fossils we have now. Not to mention that if Noah's ark did exist a boat that large would have some evidence remaining. But it doesn't....so how can you account for the billions of other cultures evidence they have preserve...yet coincidentaly yours doesn't exist? Or did it ever exist?

Answer 7

Read Gilgamesh. Written long before your bible. See anything plagiarized (Utnapishtim). The god Ea warned him of the flood and he was rewarded with immortality. And the flood story of Gilgamesh refers to an ancient story to Gilgamesh himself.

SCIENTIFIC THEORY look it up and see what it says.

We don't "want" things proven true. We test models and see the outcomes. It just so happens that life on the planet Earth evolved over the aeons. There is proof abundant.

GOOGLE "Missing Link Found" And take your pick of the multitude of fossil records that PROVE it to be true.

Better yet, get a PhD in archaeology and then decide for yourself.

Answer 8

Well first off that's not true but even if it was it wouldn't effect the validity of his theory.

If Einstein had recanted reletivity on his deathbed would it make it any less true?

If Newton had recanted gravity?

You get the picture. The author of a theory has nothing to do with it's validity.

If Anthony Flew becomes a theist does that negate all the atheistic writings he made earlier in life? No.

Answer 9

Darwin didn't recant on his death bed and even if he did it wouldn't make evolution any less true.

It would be like saying if Copernicus recanted why do people still follow it. Well the fact is we have a heliocentric system and nothing can change that fact.

Attacking science will get you no where but ridicule.

Answer 10

Darwin did not deny his own theories. Try again.

There was no "our" Nebraska man. The illustration of an ape-man was done by an artist for a popular magazine, not by a scientist. The tooth was misidentified as belonging to an ape, not an ape-man or human ancestor. It was biologists (i.e. scientists) who pointed out the error and correctly identified it as a peccary tooth.