Ha, Ha...good one.
A billion monkeys (or atheists) typing for a million years on a million typewriters will still never create the works of Shakespere.
But don't expect the evolutionists to understand what that means. They are so indoctrinated with foolish evolution theories it is quite impossible for them to think objectively anymore..
2007-08-20 04:49:20
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
5⤊
7⤋
When you disagree with someone, when you deliberately mischaracterize the other guy's position, it doesn't look bad for -him-, it looks bad for -you-. This is called a 'straw man argument', because instead of arguing with the other side you're arguing with a fake person, a straw man.
Christians often assert that evolutionists believe that people and animals came into being completely by chance, by parts falling together just randomly. But nobody believes that.
What does it say about -your- side that you have to do this rather than argue with the actual position of evolutionists?
Do Christians believe that if you disagree with someone then it's okay to make stuff up about him? Or maybe that if someone disagrees with you then he must believe whatever you don't believe, even if it's dumb?
Or do you believe that creationism is so indefensible that you can't argue for it in a logical and rational way, so you just have to blow smoke? If so, I would ask: Why bother? It only makes you look silly. Is that what your religion teaches you? That if you can't win an argument just say something stupid and walk away confident that you have 'won'?
Now, to answer your question seriously, Dells did not evolve from E-Machines but they share a common ancestor. Both did develop from 'a million pieces', or at least several thousand pieces, in only about 50 years.
2007-08-20 05:01:17
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
4⤋
No, of course not. But then, those machines do not have reproduction either. That is something most non-believers of evolution seem to miss about life: reproduction is crucial to evolution.
Next, it is quite common for people to mistake the Big Bang for a big, but typical explosion. This is not the case. Remember that the term 'Big Bang' was originally coined by someone criticizing the theory, not someone who held the theory. In any case, it was not an explosion in any sense that is typical. In a standard explosion, matter is hurled through space. In the Big Bang, it is spece itself that is expanding. The laws of physics covering these two situations are very different.
2007-08-20 04:48:45
·
answer #3
·
answered by mathematician 7
·
2⤊
4⤋
if you put two computer components together what will happen, i'll tell you nothing will happen because they are two discreet components, there is no natural law that will put them together. but on the other hand if you put carbon together with hydrogen, nitrogen, sulphur, nitrogen what do they do? they bond together into complex organic molecules, like sugars, nucleotides, and my oh my what are these, the basis for life on earth. was it magic that did this, no it was natural law, not theory, law. this does not happen by magic, don't need no one to help it, organic molecules are self assembling because of the inherent nature of their component atoms.
now i often wonder if the people who put who put forward the broken computer/watch, the tornado in the scrap yard argument ever went to school or totally lack the ability to analyse facts from a range of data and come to a logical conclusion. how do you cope, what's it like being such a small world?
2007-08-20 05:14:43
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
4⤋
It would never become a Dell. That would be devolution. Duh!
But there is a probability that the pieces could fall into place and then become a full working computer.
2007-08-20 04:48:03
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
4⤋
no one can believe in God without believing in evolution. God is the creator of matter changing through time. it is like to believe in a bicycle without wheels
some christians believe in the wheel less bicycle and atheists believe in the wheels alone
2007-08-20 05:19:12
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
2⤋
I find it hard to fathom how such regular misrepresentations of evolution are presented by proud theists.
In order to discredit something don't you need to first understand the basic facts?
Do you think evolution theory is saying that a perfect human was broken apart billions of years ago and somehow it reformed?
LOL
And monkeys with typewriters? You think that is 'objective' thinking?
LMAO
2007-08-20 04:58:10
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
4⤋
What is this? I do not know how it is that people who support intelligent design and its ilk assume that man-made technologies serve as an apt comparison for biological life. In case you haven't noticed, toasters don't think, televisions don't increase in size over time, and cell phones don't reproduce (that I am aware of).
2007-08-20 04:47:11
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
4⤋
A better comparison would be to break billions upon billions of e-machines, and wait and see if one of them reassembled. It's possible.
And I'm not athiest, I'm of the one true faith...
The western branch of American reform Presbo-lutheranism!
2007-08-20 04:47:08
·
answer #9
·
answered by Master C 6
·
2⤊
4⤋
where does it say in the theory of evolution or the big bang theory that this is likely to occur
2007-08-20 05:25:30
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
4⤋