Sounds like another concerned citizen that is afraid Bush accomplished something in North Korea. Watch how the negatives will flow when bush spanks Iran with a few missiles.
I think You meant fools not fouls.
2007-08-20 03:48:09
·
answer #1
·
answered by mr conservative 5
·
5⤊
1⤋
Lately we only invade countries whos military are easily beatable. The Iraq war was sold to us as them having weapons of mass destructions and mushroom clouds. To this day there have been no such weapons found.
Now that I got that out of my chest I will give some guesses as to why. Note that these are my own guesses or opinions. I think that unless you work for certain government groups the real reason or lack of one will not be known.
#1 what is there to gain? In Iraq there is oil. I don't know what the situation is in Iran with this respect but I don't think there isn't much oil in Korea. I mean we already have tae kwon do and laundromats. What more could we gain from them.
#2 secure threats. I do believe that Iran is developing nuclear weapons. The reason I believe this is because that whole region of the world is very unstable. Those countries over there are always fighting among each other so you figure that if you can get a hand over your enemies you would and what better way than a nuke. Its a good detterant. Also the U.S. invaded Iraq quite easily and in very short notice. What ios there to keep us from going to Iran? More reason for them to develop a nuke. It makes other people think twice. Korea already have nukes. This is why we deal with them differently. However, there is a difference between these two countries. Iran does not mind giving us a black eye or put their leg out to tripped us every time they get a chance. North Korea do not care too much about that. I think North Korea is more about showing off power and getting finatial help. Is kind of like extortion. The thing is that North Korea is not a threat as long as we give them some money or help every now and then to keep their mouth shut. I don't think you can do the same policy with Iran but, since most of our resources are tied down in Iraq what are we to do?
#2 perception. We already invaded Iraq with the disaproval of many countries and the united nations. Then again the U.N. is a joke. The thing is that if we keep invading countries we start looking more like an empire than the voice of democrasy and freedom.
#3 money. War cost a lot of money. There is not much to gain from attacking Iran and North Korea although Iran is pushing its limits. These two countries are not push over like lets say IRAQ. For the moment it might be better to try the diplomatic option. Funny how that option was not good enough for Iraq who had no WMDs or it was based on a suspision as opposed to N.K. who does have Nukes and IRAN who is developing nukes.
Ok, to answer your question I think that these countries know what I stated above. So, they will play games with the world/ They are dangerous games but games never the less. Its more like a teases and taunts. Besides why go to war. War is almost an obsolete thing. I mean you do need a military and security no doubt about that. What I mean that is better to destroy a country economically than through waging war. Here is how the wars of the future will be fought or should be fougth.
#1 embargo. Do not buy nor import any of their products. If they don't give up their treats then
#2 Blockade. No product can come in or out of their country towards any other country neither through land sea or air. This will probably have to be follow by
#3 Military strikes on their military. You take their ability to fight. This does not means invasion. All we do at this stage is destroy their military from afar as in through the air or ships using missiles and bombs. If they still don't give up then
#4 Destroy their infrastructure. Their military should be useless by now so we no target things like bridges, powerplants, dams and food supply. after amonth or more of this then you can
#5 send in the robots. Why send soldiers? just send a bunch of radio controlled vehicles and raptors terrorising the populace at random. After this comes in the actual army. tanks and what not but as a last option.
You see the plan above is to avoid the fight but destroy the enemy cheaply. At no point are you giving the enemy the chance to hurt you untill maybe step #5. By that time their populace may overthrow the government because they will be startving and suffering yet they have not even touched one of our soldiers for month. I think that once a country has its own country men against them and that they are starving and penny less the will to fight diminishes and it becomes not a viable option because by the time the real fight begins they will have nothing to fight with.
2007-08-20 04:25:40
·
answer #2
·
answered by mr_gees100_peas 6
·
0⤊
1⤋
China is quietly getting support of many tiny nations...
Iran, N. Korea, Venezuela, Chile, and Syria all are strongly influenced by China. Theyre not playing us for fools, theyre just smart enough to make friends at their level. They know that if they end up at war with anyone their enemy will have allies, probably powerful allies. Theyre already a powerhouse on their own, but that doesnt help if you have nowhere to deploy from across the globe. Theyre merely cementing themselves as a world power.
2007-08-20 03:58:49
·
answer #3
·
answered by Showtunes 6
·
1⤊
1⤋
" Iran has hanged up to 30 people in the past month amid a clampdown prompted by alleged US-backed plots to topple the regime, The Observer can reveal."
"Many executions have been carried out in public in an apparent bid to create a climate of intimidation while sending out uncompromising signals to the West. Opposition sources say at least three of the dead were political activists, contradicting government insistence that it is targeting 'thugs' and dangerous criminals. The executions have coincided with a crackdown on student activists and academics accused of trying to foment a 'soft revolution' with US support."
http://observer.guardian.co.uk/world/story/0,,2151798,00.html
THAT should answer your question!
2007-08-20 03:55:06
·
answer #4
·
answered by jleah22 2
·
1⤊
1⤋
Fools yes
2007-08-20 03:48:39
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
Yes...Iran & N. Korea are playing us for fools!!!
Why not...look at the Clown [gwb] in the White House!!!
:)
2007-08-20 03:57:42
·
answer #6
·
answered by deiracefan_219 5
·
1⤊
1⤋
i'm American, and that i think that the determination in NK, could be that there could be bigger stress from China incredibly, Japan and South Korea. because they are the main effective worldwide places that grant aide to NK. the sole determination there could be regrettably sanctions against that united states. yet, asking China to ask NK to provide up that's nucleur software might almost be similiar to the assumption for Lebanon to ask the U. S. to halt Israel's attack. NK and China are considered best chum's and that i think of the sole reason we've sturdy kinfolk to China is they have lots funds invested interior the U. S., alongside with our united states paying for their decrease priced imports. additionally, as a extensive chew of our financial device is merchandising weapons to different worldwide places, we variety of turn a blind eye while those weapons are utilized in our view as inproper techniques.
2016-11-12 23:45:17
·
answer #7
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Fools maybe. Not fouls
2007-08-20 03:47:30
·
answer #8
·
answered by Clueless 5
·
4⤊
0⤋
I didn't know that Iran and N. Korea were playing us in the Little League World series?
2007-08-20 03:49:08
·
answer #9
·
answered by Crystal Blue Persuasion 5
·
1⤊
3⤋
False, We are trying to talk to both countries to try
to defuse the situation!!
2007-08-20 04:34:02
·
answer #10
·
answered by Vagabond5879 7
·
1⤊
0⤋