English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

The Kurds and the Shiites are working on an alliance...so if the others were to drop arms and join, then demand the US leave..do we really think the Washington crowd would....personally I see it now as more of a staging ground for any potential Ian conflict and not as much for the Iraqi peoples.
http://www.iraqupdates.com/p_articles.php?refid=WH-S-20-08-2007&article=20811

2007-08-20 01:52:46 · 11 answers · asked by bruce b 3 in Politics & Government Military

11 answers

if the people of the world were able to jump over rainbows and flutter with butterflies..........?
next question.

2007-08-20 04:12:29 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

The main objective is to have a stable Iraq with a representative government. A prosperous and autonomous Iraq will serve as an example to other citizens of the Middle Eastern and show them there is a better way than religious intolerance, tribal squabbles and dictatorships. So yes, I think the US would pull out if asked after an alliance is made.

To contrast this shiny image of what could be; we look at the current situation and the even bloodier consequences of failure. Not only will Iraqi born Taliban-style totalitarians and neighboring dictators fill the void left by the US military, but the word of the US to fulfill its promises will be tarnished for generations.

To say Sunnis, Kurds, and Shiites absolutely cannot reconcile is to discredit all Iraqis as capable and compassionate humans. The same disparaging comment was often levied against Europeans less than a generation ago.

2007-08-20 03:31:37 · answer #2 · answered by floatingbloatedcorpse 4 · 0 0

the main substantial purpose is to have a effective Iraq with a representative government. A rich and self adequate Iraq will function an social accumulating to diverse voters of the middle jap and instruct them there's a miles better suitable way than non secular intolerance, tribal squabbles and dictatorships. So confident, i think of of the U. S. could desire to pull out if asked after an alliance is made. To assessment this outstanding image of what could desire to opt to be; we glance on the present difficulty and the even bloodier outcomes of failure. now not merely will Iraqi born Taliban-type totalitarians and neighboring dictators fill the void left by ability of applying the U. S. protection tension, notwithstanding the suggestions of the U. S. to fulfill its supplies could be tarnished for generations. to assert Sunnis, Kurds, and Shiites incredibly won't be in a position to reconcile is to discredit all Iraqis as in a position and compassionate human beings. the comparable disparaging assertion exchange into in many cases levied against Europeans shrink than a technologies in the previous.

2016-10-16 05:19:52 · answer #3 · answered by genthner 4 · 0 0

Yes, I do think we'd pull out. However, if you do a little homework and research the histories of those people, you'll see that they've distrusted one another for centuries. I think the real mistake the Bush Administration made was thinking for one moment that they could actually get those three groups to form a coalition government. They can't. It's not like republicans and democrats. These are people who have hated each other for centuries. It's not going to work. The US policy in Iraq has been doomed from the moment we left the power vacuum by capturing Saddam Hussein. Don't get me wrong, he was a terrible ruler who did some awful things, but they needed to have a new leader ready to take over, and that hasn't happened.

2007-08-20 01:58:09 · answer #4 · answered by Scotty Doesnt Know 7 · 2 0

If they can pull together in unity and manage to avoid the reinstitution of a theocracy…

And

Show the dedication to maintain a diplomatic working relationship with the West…

And

Commit to assisting the prevention of the Iranian sprawl into northern Africa and Europe then yes.

But we should still maintain a strong military presence in that region.

Edit:
Great answer Scotty Doesn't Know

2007-08-20 02:00:33 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

yes, absolutely, the US does NOT want an empire - but it does want friends - yes, for the oil, and there is also a certain idealism to bring "democracy" to the less fortunate. The trouble is they don't research reality enough - and are indecisive about keeping it simple and Machiavellian antics.

2007-08-20 03:35:19 · answer #6 · answered by chriscrosscomment 1 · 0 0

Yeah man, cause we just want oil!! Errr bush is evil and greedy. Errr im an angsty and rebellious teen.

2007-08-20 03:08:52 · answer #7 · answered by Conor H 2 · 0 0

I think they're both equally likely. As likely as the moon being green cheese!

2007-08-20 02:12:33 · answer #8 · answered by mommanuke 7 · 0 0

No... we were there before this problem even started they had their issues... But there was no civil war until now.. and do you really think we went there thinking of the well being for the Iraqis... ?

2007-08-20 01:59:20 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 2

Most Definately...where there's a will there's a way

2007-08-20 02:02:07 · answer #10 · answered by aqua_gurl83 2 · 1 1

fedest.com, questions and answers