Passive smoking is so called because people who doesn't smoke, breathe in the smoke of smokers.
Personally I don't see that as a free smoke, the non smoker has no choice.
2007-08-20 02:06:20
·
answer #1
·
answered by sidestepper11 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes, I guess it sort of is. But since I don't want to waste money buying cigarettes for myself, I'll take everyone else's passive smoke.
2007-08-20 02:14:29
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I don't smoke but I think passive smoking is worse than smoking. Think of it... It's came out someones mouth... Thats like me chewing a sandwich and then taking it out my mouth and giving you it.
2007-08-20 01:35:48
·
answer #3
·
answered by Ryan L 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
lol. well maybe the reason we are non-smokers is because we don't want to smoke, so maybe it is the smokers who are forcing us to smoke through passive smoking. so maybe they should pay uus like compensation for trying to put our health at risk hehe
2007-08-20 11:58:28
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes it is stealing and they should have to pay part of the tobacco tax. My cigars are getting way too expensive.
2007-08-20 04:19:26
·
answer #5
·
answered by US_DR_JD 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
if your a smoker then id say yes, buy your own!!!
2007-08-20 01:33:08
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
No...but it may be STEALING it
2007-08-20 01:35:37
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋