Is it not a crime to start a war with a "self made reason"?

Question

because a lot of us europeans are thinking like that, about the iraq war!What do you think and why?

Answer 1

Wie geht's andreas_strozewski?

Bush is the Tool or Slave of Isreal. Where are Iraq's weapons of mass destruction? An insurgent is a person revolting against an established government. How can a Muslim be an insurgent when Iraq really does not have an established government. His lied caused chaos in Iraq, however, Former President Clinton was removed from office when his sexual lie did not bankrupt the country or cause death or permanent injury such as the loss of a person's appendage.

Since an insurgent is one that revolts against a governing body or legislation according to a Webster's Dictionary, I presume that George Washington shall be considered an insurgent who led a "Revolutionary" War against British Redcoats to gain Independence. Therefore, the Colonials led by George Washington was an insurgent group. Also, the Fourth of July Holiday for Americans is a celebration of Independence for Americans that the United States earned through an insurgency called the Colonials.

If another country in the world would make a lie about the United States and state that the United States had weapons of mass destruction and invaded the United States, Americans would act identical to the Iraqi "so-called" insurgents which is to fight to protect the "American Freedom". What do you want? Iraqis to do give warm hugs when the U.S. military bombed Baghdad and declares war on Muslims. Just as Americans wanted revenge for 9/11/2001, the Iraqis want revenge for the United States's terrorist attack on Baghdad, Iraq when Iraq has NEVER BEEN PROVEN TO BEING INVOLVED WITH 9/11! America or the United States is the Slave of Isreal. Bush's lobbyists consist mostly of Jews. Isreal is allied with Bush in order to buy the United States military equipment to become the stronghold of the Middle East and to declare the war on Muslims.

September, 11, 2001 may not have been terrorist attack, it could have easily been a revenge attack because the United States Federal Government may have been irrationally treating the Middle East in a top secretive manner of hostility. The United States Federal Government will never admit to this since, similar to Pat Tillman, it is black op operations and does not want their citizens to know what is actually happening. Instead, every person in the United States believes that their government is correct when they would become disgusted if they were to ever discover the truth, which is impossible to information being declassified. In other words, the United States Federal Government may have performed hostile actions toward Muslims without ever being placed on the media, therefore, never knowing. If something happens to Isreal, how swift it is placed on American media, especially radical FOX News all propaganda without facts!!!

Also, please refer and read about Operation Northwoods or the Northwood Operation of the 1960s.

Did the hijackers not live in Florida and train in flight schools in Florida, which is the state governed by George W. Bush's brother Jeb Bush? Was not Marvin Bush working in The Twin Towers purchasing stock in airlines and insurance claims prior to September 11, 2001? Out of all days in the year of 2001, how come George W. Bush was in Florida that day? What is that calculated probability?

Referring back towards Bush and Jews, why is Hitler looked upon negatively for the Holocaust of Jews? How come the Jewish people seemed to be the only group remembered in memorials? What about the Poles, gypsy, mentally and physically handicapped, Danes, French, Czech, homosexuals, and etc. The only reason Americans feel sympathy for Isreal is because the United States is the TOOL OF ISREAL and all of its American media. If the United States was faced with the same conditions under The Treaty of Versailles, for example Deutschland was only allowed 100,000 soldiers with no Air Force or Navy to protect the Greatest Country Deutschland, the United States would have seeked revenge just as identical to Hitler trying to "Aufbau" or build up Deutschland after the collapse and depression of Berlin.

Today, the United States does not want Iran to pursue nuclear or atomic weapons. However, the United States used an atomic bomb on Japan. For all religious groups against abortion, did the atomic bombs not cause birth mutations and death of fetuses nursed by Japanese women? The only reason the United States does not want Iran to have weapons is to protect Isreal. Bush is war crazy, therefore, why is he and the United States Department of Defense permitted to pursue atomic weapons and military technology? Does this make other nations on this planet feel safe since the United States is war aggressive? Why cannot Iran help supply Iraqi with military technology to guerilla warfare groups? Does not the United States utilize other countries for help in Iraq such possibilites as Canada, England, Germany, Poland, Japan, and Austrailia armed forces? Therefore, why the hypocrisy from the Bush Administration about Iran assisting Iraqi? What did Iraq do to any of the above mentioned nations or countries?

The world is exhausted by the Bush Administration hypocrisy. Commander in Chief sounds too similar to Hitler, but those who support Bush CANNOT ADMIT TO HIS DICTATORSHIP when it comes to the war in Iraq on the people whom follow Prophet Muhammad, peace be upon Him. Therefore, the United States has their own version of the Third Reich. If people in the United States can praise Bush, then others should be able to praise Hitler. The United States population, therefore, should no longer be able to critize the Third Reich historically.

George Bush has caused many Iraqis an awful fate. If Saddam Hussein was excuted for harshly treating Iraqis, therefore, where is Bush's "equal punishment"? Bush caused more Iraqi to die than Saddam. STOP DEFENDING BUSH. If you still insist to support Bush and are at least eighteen years old, then join the military and deploy to Iraq if you have nothing to be frightened of...it is only post-war stress syndrome, loss of an appendage, or death. Not too bad for consequences when going to a war with a country that never attacked the United States? The United States should only declare war if a country had or attempted to attack the United States. Therefore, the United States has a quantity of the Third Reich in its blood, which the United States shall never have the ability to critize the Harkencreuz, Eisen Creuz, Waffen Shutzstaffel, Panzer, or any other Third Reich terminology including Blitzkrieg.

The United States CANNOT STAY IN IRAQ FOREVER. WHERE WILL THE UNITED STATES GET THE FUNDING AND ADDITIONAL TROOPS NEEDED? Have a military draft and probably be sure to view consequences similar to what is currently occurring in Iraq (vengeful protests and civil war).

This answer is coming from inside the United States, but I am of pure European, German blood and heritage. If the United States does not impeach George W. Bush and Dick Cheney is because the Americans are pathetic Isreali slaves, which who are brainwashed by Jewish interests and Western democracy. Americans are so stupid that when Florida was recounting the chads in the 2000 election, the Americans DO NOT UNDERSTAND THAT DEMOCRACY DOES NOT EXIST! IT IS NOT INDIVIDUAL POPULAR VOTES FROM REGISTERED VOTERS, BUT IS THE ELECTORAL COLLEGE VOTES THAT ELECT THE PRESIDENT!!! THEREFORE, WHAT WAS THE POINT OF COUNTING THE CHADS AND VOTING IN GENERAL ELECTIONS?

USE THE AMERICAN MARINE SAYING AGAINST THE AMERICAN BUSH ADMINISTRATORING HYOCRITES.... KILL THEM ALL AND LET GOD SORT THEM!!! It seems okay to do this to Iraqi, but the Americans would dislike this situation if it would happen to them. Look at their reaction to Hurricane Katrina and the incident at VT University.

Für Deutschland und alle meine Deutsch bruders / Deutsch freunds, "Deutschland, Deutschland über alles!"

andreas_strozewski get me out of U.S.! My Family from Hamburg, speak German, will only fight for, want to work in Deutschland!

Answer 2

Please, the so-called "international law" has no credibility with anyone who actually knows it. It's a crime to invade Iraq against the wishes of France, but it wasn't a crime for the Nazis to starve a million people in Leningrad during World War II. Apparently, it wasn't a crime for Chechen Muslim militants to occupy a school and kill over 350 children (terrorism is not a crime under "international law"). The list goes on "ad nauseam".

Answer 3

Try getting your info from sources other than the BBC or CNN.

There were no self-made reasons. There were a long list of violations of which several alone were authority enough to go in. The UN didn't have the balls.

Answer 4

I smell coward in this room, are you French? So.. the terrorist are treating you Euros well Huh? You surrender monkeys never cease to amase me. Who do you think your government will turn to when you have nothing left to offer the Muslim terrorist? Turn the other cheek and continue to hide from the fact that because you are cowardace, this only fuels their lust for your DEATH!!!
Go open up the family treasure chest and take out white flag your fore fathers used during WWII. Please dont stand up for yourselves. Continue to blame America for all the ills of the world. Terrorist arent really bad......their just acting out!

Answer 5

Leading the country to war under false pretenses, is an impeachable offense. However, only a sex scandal can impeach a President in this soap opera country, where we choose our officials by the ads they run on TV. The greatest generation that saved the world from Fascism is gone, don't look to America for any solace or integrity, we sold our soul to the company store.

Answer 6

George W Bush started the war for the worst possible "self made reason". He invaded Iraq for no other reason than his own personal vanity. This man thought the war would be his "legacy" and that he would go down in history as a better president than his father.

After all, his father did not get the bogeyman, Saddam Hussein. I see everything worked out fine in Iraq after Hussein left the scene.

Answer 7

Saddam Hussein did have self made reasons when he tried to invade Iran, when he invaded Kuwait, and when he subjugated his people. He paid for his war crimes. His people put him on trial and found him guilty. That is the way laws are supposed to work.

Answer 8

Not quite sure where you are coming from on this............

alot of people forget that France, Germany, Russia, were benefiting from the UN oil for food program........
and especially from the CORRUPTION in the program....

so Saddam was amassing Billions of Euros/dollars.......
if we did not go in ...........where would be today..........?

maybe it was foolish for us to think that region could live with a Jeffersonian style democracy.........I think they understand blunt force trauma instead...

and to edit.....

I guess the old style European Colonialism did not set the stage for this?

Answer 9

The UN doesn't have the balls to try George Bush and Dick Cheney for crimes against humanity. Besides, they DID get rid of Saddam Hussein.

Answer 10

Not enough info with your whine. "Self made reason", this makes no sense. There were many reasons to justify the invasion of Iraq. Maybe Euro's are to stupid to understand them or to pansied to have the guts to take action when needed.

Answer 11

No its not a crime if we did it by mistake, besides we are america and have this big military that we need to use to dominate the important markets to ensure power stays in the hands of our ruling elite.