I mean, it's mostly the same drivers, right? And what ever happened to the trucks? That was pretty stupid.
It seems to me that once every blue moon you'll get an exciting NASCAR race (something any fan can get in to), like that really close one Ricky Craven won. So I am not a diehard.
It seems to me the playoff system was designed to attract fringe viewers like me; it also seems to alienate real fans whom NASCAR assumes will eat all their crap and grin no matter what.
Now, it also seems to me that NASCAR's plan to attract viewers like me is pretty stupid, because I, along with most of the rest of the American sports audience, will focus on football on Sunday.
So NASCAR crowns its champion using its incomprehensible points system (incomprehensible to a casual fan who doesn't know if a 100 point lead is small or huge), ending the season in as anticlimactic a manner possible. Since only the diehards care (in the face of the NFL competition), why punish the diehards?
2007-08-19
21:11:43
·
4 answers
·
asked by
orwellian987
3
in
Sports
➔ Auto Racing
➔ NASCAR
Why would "CUP" drivers want to do the Busch races (and be cynical about it if possible)? And elaborate on the difference in power.
And does NASCAR's hamfisted attempts at attracting a multicultural audience threaten you (rap crack).
Much like basball, which is losing street cred and promising black athlete's to other sports, it's clear if NASCAR is to really become mainstream it needs to get multicultural enough to become palatable to a general audiences, but not so multicultural as to piss off it's core fans, fans who "don't take kindly..."
(and yes I know NASCAR has a billion fans and can already be considered mainstream, but we know who really loves it and who doesn't...so it's not mainstream, it's moonshiners racing around dirt tracks...for now, until NASCAR gets its way and goes for the affront to God money).
2007-08-19
21:39:13 ·
update #1