Microsoft supports the anti-hunting movement?

Question

Microsoft, the software giant, will make a $100,000 donation to the Humane Society of the United States (HSUS) and is partnering with the group on a pilot program called the i’m Initiative. Through the new program, whenever a Windows Live Messenger user has a conversation using i’m, Microsoft will give a portion of the program’s advertising revenue to one of ten organizations selected by the user. The HSUS is one of the choices, and there is no limit to the amount of money that can be donated.

The U.S. Sportsmen’s Alliance, the nation’s leading sportsmen’s advocacy organization, has urged Microsoft to end its support of HSUS, but the company refused. According to Microsoft representative Tara Kriese, Microsoft believes the i’m Initiative is “a great way to enable people to help causes that are important to them.”

Answer 1

I think Microsoft doesn't so much give a damn about animals as they do about gun control. Remove the sport of hunting, and that's one less legitimate use the public has to own them.

They have, as have many other corporations and elitist private groups, siezed upon the idea that Hunting can be eliminated by playing upon the misplaced sympathies of liberal-minded city folk who know and understand nothing about wildlife conservation and hunting,or about how hunting and wildlife conservation walk hand-in-hand to protect and nurture our wild resources.
All they see is a dead animal with fur. Poor kitty.

Mega-corporations are about widespread control.
Control of money,
Control of media,
Control of ideas,
Control of rights,
and ultimately, control of you.

This has historically been difficult to accomplish when "the inconsequential many" that "the privilaged few" seek ever-tightening control over, happen to be legally armed!

Hunting has often been the brick wall anti-gunners have run up against in their attempts to disarm the populace.

Remove that wall by demonizing and eliminating hunting, and
The right to bear arms is one step closer to history.

Answer 2

properly, it incredibly is peoples' possibilities. i think of it incredibly is incredibly pathetic once you hit upon adult adult males whose dream in existence is to bypass to Africa and kill some endangered animal so they could mount it incredibly is head on their wall. For animals with secure populations being looked for his or her meat, it incredibly isn't any subject. i think of that the main flaw with many animal rights communities is that it incredibly is greater based upon emotion than the rest. They throw a greater healthy over the seal hunt, yet in hassle-free terms because of the fact toddler seals are oh so lovable. the certainty that when the seek has been positioned on moritorium in the previous, the seal inhabitants surely exploded and destroyed fish shares does not count. yet we are residing in a unfastened society the place poeple are allowed to push for issues in the event that they opt to in spite of no count if or not they are suitable or incorrect. no person is forcing you to donate money to them. Strongly conservative human beings look to consistently think of that pedophilia is the biggest difficulty in the entire universe to handle. What bearing directly to the thousands of hundreds of human beings slaughtered in Sudan or HIV contaminated populations of Sub-Saharan Africa? Are those not priorities approximately that? it incredibly is all subjective, what's a precedence to you isn't to somebody else.

Answer 3

The protection of domesticated animals is great but to support anti-hunting anything is freaking stupid. How many thousands of years have humans hunted for their meals? Why the hell would we stop now just because more than half of society is a bunch of "city" people that have never hunted/fished and really on mcdonalds for a source of food.
Screw anti hunting projects and the people that set them in motion. I hunt for meat, not trophey.

Answer 4

micro soft is yet another evil corporation, like wal mart. they, as most corporations, don't give a damn about anything but proit and publicly lookin' good so they can make more money.

Answer 5

Defend your Right to keep and bear arms, or die in the process of Defending that Right*...

Answer 6

What, you have a problem with someone having an opinion that conflicts with yours? You're in favor of hunting, other people are against it. That's the consequence of a free society; deal with it.

Answer 7

i think you should pick james j

Answer 8

so what's the question?