Prominent Creationist Scientist Em Adjineri has recently returned from months of studying starfish in the wild and has concluded that starfish disprove evolutionology. She discovered that starfish possess both fish DNA and star DNA. Therefore, starfish are hybrids of fish and stars.
However, the possibility of a fish-star hybrid occurring naturally in the wild is infinitesimal. The natural habitats of fish (the ocean) and stars (the sky) are light years apart, so fish-star interaction is exceedingly rare.
Additionally, in all of the Em Adjineri experiments, the heat from the star cooked the fish before insemination could occur. This proves that starfish could not have evolved naturally.
The only explanation is that starfish were intelligently designed by God. God must have impregnated a fish with star DNA much in the way he impregnated Mary with his Heavenly DNA.
Take that, intellectualutionists!
2007-08-19 10:23:00 · 19 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
tentofield: Say Em Adjineri's name out loud and then you'll discover why she can't get published in a peer-reviewed scientific journal.
2007-08-19 10:34:37 · update #1
Heh.
Nice.
I love the Em Adjineri experiments.
2007-08-19 10:27:25 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Um, how can I put this politely.....
Everyone knows that this "finding" has been disproved in "Evolutionist Monthly". It was an ancient fish that was heat proof that mated with the stars. The fish can also fly to space. Therefore, the fish certainly did mate with the star.
2007-08-19 10:28:45 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
You're too late to be tellin' them dumb a ss fish to stop messin' with them stars fore tey git theirself fried.
Me and my friends been worryin on that ever cents we learn't about some dumb a ss fish called Pisces was screwin' around up there.
And I think yer jest jelus of us Intellectualutionists people.
Yer Creationaryologist frend can't help you if you got no cents, and jest go round name callin, and actin' igorant.
2007-08-19 11:13:31 · answer #3 · answered by big j 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Sources? None.
Good job. Star DNA? ROFL!
2007-08-19 10:30:01 · answer #4 · answered by nckmcgwn 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
you forget that our own sun is a star, and light from it only takes 8 minutes to reach the earth. added to that the solar flares and sunspots, it's a wonder we're not all made of stellar matter.
it's just that science hasn't discovered it yet.............
all hail Em Adjinary
2007-08-19 12:13:19 · answer #5 · answered by witchfinder general 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
"Creationist Scientist" is an oxymoron. Please provide the reference to the paper in a peer reviewed scientific journal so I can read Dr Em Adjineri's work.
2007-08-19 10:31:09 · answer #6 · answered by tentofield 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Thanks for 2pts. Things evolve up to God and the universe is not static. One of the greatest signs of evolving is getting a sense of humor, this is a grin.
2007-08-19 10:29:25 · answer #7 · answered by Princessa Macha Venial 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Rarely is the question asked: Is them fundies learning?
Hey, maybe you've misunderestimicated the educationacated evolutionismists.
2007-08-19 10:32:44 · answer #8 · answered by Dolores G. Llamas 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
before i realized who had posted this, i was going to ask for sources, and go into a long rant about your general intellegence and lack of understanding of any possible scientific theory..
but it is you...so i see the sarcasam..
funny.
2007-08-19 10:32:20 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Yeah, and jellyfish is the result of a circumcised fish masturbating.
2007-08-19 10:30:09 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋