What is the worst charge of assult and how long would be the statue of limitations be in the state of ct?
2007-08-19 09:20:17 · 5 answers · asked by jeff o 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Law Enforcement & Police
It varies from state to state I live in AZ so our laws are different than your state laws. If I were you I would call your local police department and ask them if they have run out I would file the report as soon as possible to insure they don't run out on you.
2007-08-19 10:30:00 · answer #1 · answered by Steven C 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Under current law, the statute of limitations for first-, second-, and third-degree sexual assault; aggravated sexual assault; sexual assault in a spousal or cohabitating relationship; and third-degree sexual assault with a firearm depend upon the circumstances. A person may be prosecuted up to 20 years from the date the offense was committed if the victim notified the police or a prosecutor of the offense within five years of its commission and the perpetrator is identified by DNA analysis.
2007-08-19 09:28:51 · answer #2 · answered by Mary W 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
2 Years, Conn. Gen. State. Sec. 52-58
Misdemeanors and petty charges often have a statute of limitations of one to two years. Essentially, if someone is not charged within that period, he or she can never be tried for the crime. The statute of limitations does not apply if the suspect is a fugitive, or cannot be located for prosecution.
2007-08-19 09:32:35 · answer #3 · answered by railer01 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
In England & Wales attack and battery or ABH as we call it fairly is a criminal offence. there's no statute of obstacles in comprehend of any criminal offences. you're able to nicely be tried regarding a criminal offence at any point on your existence regardless of whilst it occured. i could be very stunned if the regulation is diverse everywhere else. it could make a mockery of teh regulation if people could desire to devote a criminal offence and merely conceal away for various years to circumvent prosecution. The regulation could take account of the realities of existence and as a result not supply possibilities for escape from justice on such grounds. in spite of the undeniable fact that if the offence occured an exceedingly long term in the past it may desire to be debatable that it 'isn't in the ordinary public pastime for the prosecution to proceed' or in spite of the shown fact that there may well be some medical clarification why the prosecution of the offence could volume to a miscarriage of justice or 'abuse of technique'.
2016-10-16 03:46:22 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Jeff, why don't you give me your name, address, phone number and tell me what you did and I will check it out for you.
2007-08-19 09:33:00 · answer #5 · answered by Michael G 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋