Do you believe it easier to prove God is real or easier to prove God is not real?

Question

If you can prove it back it up with proof. If not be sure of your answer.

Answer 1

Yes its so simple to Prove that god Exists..!!
Just look at the wonderful nature around u.. The Sun,Moon,Stars,Galaxies,Ur own body,The complexity of a single cell,..it goes on.. Do u think all of this came just like that.. Dont u think that the big bang theory is rediculous?.. U mean to say all matter,energy,space,time,..and all that exists came out of nothing..!!?? Well.. that requires a 1000 times more faith than to believe that God created everything..!!!

Answer 2

That would be like trying to prove the Theory Of Everything. Scientists can't do it either. To not believe in a concept requires proof also. The concept and word does exist in the the dictionary and in the mind. I think the proof will be found in the preponderance of evidence in Quantum Physics with the ability to handle all known data with Quantum Computers. The interesting thing is that they are finding that the brain can already do that by using images and that's why the proof is subjective. Subjectivity in it's positive definition is really more powerful, for the intuitive, then objectivity and much under rated. After all the mind is NOT just observing life from the outside. If we can't believe the law of probablilities then Quantum Physics is flawed already and we need a new science, a 'good' unified field theory perhaps. The big bang theory also includes an infinite force so you might say, the Force has always been with us. If we had created a different world Saddam would have been different. He lived in the world we created. "He gave them dominion over the earth."

Answer 3

I honestly don't think the concept of deity can ultimately be "proved" either way, since "God" is such an ambiguous concept.

I think you can "prove" God "exists" if you use a vague enough definition (e.g., "God is Love"). But at that point you're stuck with a useless term that doesn't really apply to anything else (in this case, why couldn't we just use "love" since we already have a word for that concept?).

Likewise, I think you can "prove" God does not exist if you use a strict enough definition (e.g., an omni-present, omni-benevolent, omnipotent, and five other "omni-" adjectives, who lives in this place and looks like this). But again you run into the problem of having a definition that not everybody uses.

All of the "God" proofs I've seen had some kind of flaw. The "pro" arguments usually rest on the assumption that deity is the only explanation for complexity, and the "con" arguments usually rest on the assumption that everybody views deity in the same way and with the same properties. However, the burden of proof is still on the theists.

Answer 4

no one has proved or disproved that God exists. i dont think you can.
but there are those who kno in their hearts that He does exist, and those who find it hard/impossible to believe in somthing which they cant physicaly see

everything people say to prove or disprove Gods existance are just theories. there is no solid evidence either way


sum may say that things in the Bible have been found (like the ark noah was in, or fragmints of it (i dont kno if they have found it)) but this only proves thier existence, not Gods existance.
sum may say scientists have proved that the universe was created from the big bang, this is still a theory and whos to say God didnt make it like that?

so there is no way u can use matireial things to prove or disprove God, and therefore no way humans can prove or disprove God

there are several ways which people try to prove or disprove Gods existance, but they are all still theories and based on ideas like "surely such a complicated universe would have an intelligent designer behind it", and on the other side "y would a god let there be so much suffering in the world?". these are both assumptions and not actual proofs


there are also probably arguments agains both of these, but because i have not been told the argument against the 1st one i only kno the argument against the 2nd one: "if u read the Bible u will notice that God amde man with free choice so that man would not be a robot. only beings with free will can truly love, and man was created for this pourpose(to have a loving relationship with God (no, not sexualy u noob)). therfore because of this free will man can chose to do not only good but also evil, this is y there are such horrors in the world. not because it is Gods choice but because it is mans choice."

this is quoted because it is wat people have said, based on wat the Bible says (there is no proof which i have heard of to say that the Bible is true)

in the end it is up to u wat u think
dont ignor either side of the story, it is improtant that you understand and consider both. i dont wat to push u either way. i just tryed to give u both sides so might understand both sides and make and educated decision for your self.

Answer 5

Proof of a God, you are here right? A long line of relatives had to survive through the ages for you to be here. When your mother gave birth, she could have given birth to another child (other dna combinations were in play when you were conceived). How many other planets in the Universe can sustain life based on what we know? Count the number of good things in your life starting with family members that you love. In my opinion all of this is strong evidence that there is a loving God. Deus caritas est.

Answer 6

Looking at the universe, from the macrocosmic to the subatomic, one can't help but understand that there had to be an intelligence that created all of the order that we see, an order which came from the ultimate chaos called the Big Bang.

Speaking of which, it is generally accepted that the Universe started as a small ball of incredibly hot, dense plasma which exploded and created our present universe..

Now the laws of thermodynamicsa state that a stable object will remain in a set state unless "work" is performed on the system.That being the case, the plasma ball should have remained in it's initial state.

However it exploded in a violence that has cause the universe to expand at a velocity in which it has overcome it's own gravitational attraction and will expand forever.

This brings up several quandaries.

First, if the plasma ball exploded naturally, the universe would expand to a point and then gravity would cause it to collapse back into the ball again.

However, it is expanding at a rate that exceeds it's own gravitational attraction, so "work" was performed on the system in that energy was added to the plasma ball.

Secondly, the plasma ball would not have exploded naturally, as it was in a stable state. So one of two things must have happened.

1. The ball had energy added to it, forcing it to explode.

2. Something added energy to the ball in the form of compression which caused it to violently explode once the compression was released.

In either case, energy was added to the system from an outside source.was added to the plasma ball. And considering thsat the expansion rate of the universe was just right for the formation of stars, galaxies and planets, that points to a guiding Intelligence behind it all.

Scientists are desperately looking for "dark matter" as they cannot countenance the idea that the universe will never contract, as it violates the laws of physics and points to work being performed by a source outside of our universe.

Yet this very violation of the laws of physics points to God having created and guided the whole of what surrounds us, for only He would have the intelligence and power to do so.

As Paul said of the issue;

Romans 1:19-21

19 because what may be known of God is manifest in them, for God has shown it to them.

20 For since the creation of the world His invisible attributes are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made, even His eternal power and Godhead, so that they are without excuse,

21 because, although they knew God, they did not glorify Him as God, nor were thankful, but became futile in their thoughts, and their foolish hearts were darkened.


They see the evidence of God in the universe, yet they refuse to acknowledge Him.

So who is worse off, the blind man who cannot see God's handiwork around him, or the fool who refuses to see God's handiwork around him?

Answer 7

It's easier to prove that the sky fairy does not exsist and never has :::::: we all know that the dinosaurs were real,
because we have the fossil bones to prove it.
now why weren't they recorded when the tooth fairy was walking on the Earth,my belief is that the skypilot was never here and never exsisted,it was a collective lie that the wanker Christians used to get people to follow them,maybe
in the same way as a bully get's others to do his dirty work.
Now if your good enough ? Prove me wrong??????

Answer 8

I think it is easier to prove God is not real. If god create mankind and love them, how can God create the groups of mankind in places like Darfur or other parts of the world where mankind are suffering? How can he create people like Hitler or Saddam ?

Answer 9

No one can prove or disprove God's existence. It is a logical inference. For instance, is it more logical to infer that we came into being by chance from nothing or could an infinite intelligence have caused it.

Answer 10

It is easier to prove God is real. If you aren't sure, pray into outer space that if there is a God, for Him to reveal himself to you. He will...period.