Who killedJ F Kennedy?

Question

Member since: 16 June 2006
Total points: 136 (Level 1)
Points earned this week:
--% Best answer

George C
S Who killed President J F Kennedy?
A UK television programme many years ago viewed by millions was conducted by a British CSI team. Their analysis was very military and astoundingly convincing. Essentially they concluded JFK was shot from the front seat of the Limo by the security agent sitting in the front passenger seat. They argued analysing the film footage that the aired and most commonly seen news coverage itself was edited. The agent in the front seat going for his weapon drawing it, they deturmined a second or two where they concluded the agent shot JFK under the chin at close range blowing the back of his head out, aND HIS GUN returns TO THE HOLSTER.

It was some time ago in the |UK when this programme was aired there were four main TV channels at the time BBC 1, BBC2, ITV, Channel 4, so it was on one of these if anyone wanted to check out the documentary. It really did go into such alot of detail taking most of the known arguements but actually looking at the CSI difficulties of the no ortopsy in DC was the biggest kind of post assaination issue as if I recall correctly the order no to do an ortopsy had to come from either the chief of staff or the vice president himself. What was surprising was is they did not finger the name of the front seat assasin as I recall. Any one out there got any details.

One of the curious qwirks is the Aristotle Onasis connection in the aftermath jackie's escape or what.

Answer 1

FBI or the CIA!!!

Answer 2

I don't claim to know who shot Kennedy but I know it wasn't the way the Wrren Commission reported it and the proof is so obvious the nay-sayers fail to see it. The bullet that Oswald supposedly fired from a rifle that is hadly accurate at the range h e supposedly fired it from, supposedly entered Kennedy's skull, out his throat, through the front seat and into Governor John Connally's shoulder without incurring even the slightest scratch. This is impossible. Secondly,Oswald said very convincingly, "I didn't kill anyone. I'm a patsy." Indicating he was part of a larger scheme. The next day (or two) Oswald was shot dead. There are several other proofs though if you try hard emough you can rationalize many of them. The coroner in Dallas showing the wound comung from a direction indicating the shot didn't come from where Oswald was supposed to have been (The coroner wasn't particulaly aware of where Oswald was supposed to have been) and the Coronerin Washington giving a very different picture o how the event happened. Supposedly the skull woound had been tampered with. TYHree people getting close to finding information on the assasignaiton all came up dead within a short time of each other through accidents, etc. This certainly doesn't indicate a larger plot. But just more bits to fit into the puzzle. Kennedy had made many enemies. He was supposedly going to close down the Vietnam war. He was going to start regulating the oil industry. The oil industry is probably the most self-rightious grouip of conglomerates as we have seen through the acitons of Enron, Haliburton and others profiting from the death and misery of Iraq. Kennedy also had angered many over his forcing intergration. Russia wasn't very happy about Kennedy after he forced them to take their missles out of Cuba.

Plus, what was Oswald's motive? Why would he plan this assignation and then deny it if he was this supposed "nut-case?" Wouldn't he glory in it if he did it just to do it? Plus there are opposing stories of Oswald being a mediocre shot at best against him being a good shot. But siupposedly his military records show he was NOT a good shot.

Time is passing and those who might know, are dying off. Perhaps we will never know who killed Kennedy. But I believe any logical thinking man or woman, after studying the facts must conclude, at the least, the Warren Commission does not give us the Truth. I personally beleive Oswald did not kill Kennedy but was part of a larger plan.

Since Kennedy's death we have seen the rise of the NeoCons with the religious right

Answer 3

I DID IT!!! IT WAS ME!!! FINALY I CAN CONFESS TO WHAT I HAVE DONE!

I dont know who killed JFK but i don't beleive it was Oswald. The "magic bullet" theory is complete rubbish and i dont think anyone could beleive that even with the best will in the world.
On the other hand, the person that pulled the trigger may not be the most guilty person sinse it would be easy for a political opponent or enemy (both of which he had in abundance) to hire an assasin.

Answer 4

I Remember that program it brought to my attention for the first time the allegation that Lee Harvey Oswarld may have been to far a way to have hit JFK with the type of weapon he had.

However there was a more recent Uk docummentry where someone demonstrated useing the same riffle and hiting the target from what was alleged to have been the same distence.

" The truth is out there.

Answer 5

Jimmy "the Weisel" Frattiano claimed that Giancana (the then Boss of Bosses out of Chicago) gave the go ahead for Marcello (of New Orleans) to carry out the assassination. It involved Castro (who had a grudge after finding out the CIA was behind the Bay of Pigs Invastion) so he got a patsy (Oswald) from the Russians to carry-out the deed. Marcello's beef was a result of RFK's investigations into organized crime. To cover the link to the Mafia, Marcello had Jack Ruby (a two bit night club owner in the Marcello organization) take out Oswald to seal his lips.

Giancana's beef with JFK was his impression that JFK renigged on promises to leave the Mafia alone since he felt he pulled strings in Chicago to get him elected.

Several weeks before the assassination, Oswald met with Cuban agents in Mexico. For inexplicable reasons, the FBI agents who were following up the Cuban connection as a part of the Warren Commission investigation, were recalled

Answer 6

The CIA and the mob worked together.

My reasons for this is simple. Kennedy did a few things to really ruffle some feathers.

First, he put the coinage of money back into the hands of Congress. This would mean there would be limits on how much money could be spent on war. Not a good thing for the military industrial complex.

Right now, all Congress does is approve debt ceilings. They have no oversight of how much money is being printed up by the Federal Reserve Bank.

If M3 reporting was still being done, then Congress could have oversight of how much money is being printed up and could control how much is being spent on the war.

This would mean there would be the ability to limit on how much could be spent on war. Not a good thing for the military industrial complex.

Second, he fired both Allen Dulles (Director of the CIA) and General Charles Caball (Deputy Director of the CIA).

Oh, by the way, Roy Caball, his brother, was the mayor of Dallas at the time.

The CIA can't afford to be implicated in any crimes so they hired the mob to do their dirty work.

Answer 7

I watched this way back in the 60s and had the same thoughts as your self no way did that guy fire those shots from that building. From that day to this am still covinced cia or similar were involved in Kennedies assassination.

Answer 8

The Illuminati

Answer 9

The Rolling Stones said it was you and I in the song "Sympathy For the Devil". That's about as close to the truth as you're ever going to get !

Answer 10

Lee Harvey Oswald. He acted alone.

If you to read the best work on the subject, read Gerald Posner's "Case Closed". Vincent Bugleosi, who prosecuted Charles Manson, also has new book out on the subject.

Answer 11

I think Jacky might have noticed if that agent had pulled out his pistol and wasted JFK.
GOOD NIGHT JOSEPHINE!