i am having a debate with someone about anabolic steroids , i am for them and she is against them .?

Question

I olny want opinions from people who know alot about steroids , (I.E. doctors , body builders , athletes ) . I think that supplements like the new muscle tech products forms of tribulis like t-bomb and other sorts of supplements of that nate mainly for bodybuilding are worse on you then a FDA approved pharmacuetical grade steroid (done in moderation) like a deca and sustanon coclktail of 500 mg each a week . The supplements in my expierience have often given me the same if not worse side effects and I want opinions that will ease the mind of the person I am arguing with . I understand i should do it naturally but with competion these days that is almost impossible ( most would agree?) so please state your opinions from a profesional stand point or that of expierience . I need to settle this debate.

Answer 1

I took a couple of cycles of back in 1997 when I was 20 years old. The amount of weight I could squat and bench press went up phenomenally, but it kind of made my body 'puffy' looking and they were expensive. I wasn't competitive at all, I just had a desire to get big. I lived close to Mexico where pharmaceuticals are easy to get and I lifted weights every day, so it was just a matter of time before I tried it out. I can't say much about the long term effects. I do remember that it's important not to take them continuously or you will have undesireable side effects due to hormonal imbalances. If you do take them, cycle on, then cycle off. I took tablets and never tried the shots. I think it's a bad idea for men and a really bad idea for women, but I understand that people will do it anyway because I was one of them.

Answer 2

ok, Hank Aaron did no longer take steroids, his breaking the homestead run record become honest and sq.. it does no longer have got here approximately had the lifeless ball era resulted in the previous 1915, Babe Ruth might have hit a minimum of yet another one hundred homestead runs or extra in his little ones, had Ted Williams no longer ignored 4 years to international warfare 2 in his top and intensely almost 3 years to serving in Korea, nevertheless in top, he might have in all probability extra much extra or matched Aaron, and neither of them did steroids. Aaron, Ruth, Williams, Mays etc are those gamers, as with Walter Johnson and Cy youthful who're naturallly gifted and committed to play their suitable and toughest. They have been the suitable and are nevertheless how we diploma skills by ability of. As to believing each little thing a washed up pitcher, out to sell his e book, to make money, Bouton become a bum, particular there ought to have been gamers who took pills to stay wide awake on the line-i do the comparable, yet they do no longer make me into some super guy. As suggested, i observed Bouton play, and examine his stinking e book, and would say this, he become a marginal skills, who like maximum marginal abilities-lie approximately others, incenuate untruths to help in making themselves seem extra advantageous. As to being harsh, we tell little ones to no longer take risky aspects, so why ought to we condone human beings like Barry Bonds for what he does utilising steroids. Bonds become a super participant without them, and no rely if or no longer he broke the alltime HR record without utilising them is in undemanding terms conjecture, yet he having used them is sufficient to bitter all of baseball apart from different juicers to seem upon him favorably-he cheapened himself and the recreation.

Answer 3

Steroid use can permanently ruin your health. Even when we give them to treat medical conditions we are aware that it's a choice between the devil and the deep blue sea. Is it really worth it to you?