ridiculous statement, ridiculous question?

Question

some on this R&S site said in a letter to me, that an organ transplant proves evolution, to me this is a strech, a desparate strech, what do you think?

Answer 1

how in the world does an organ transplant prove evolution? That one is SO ridiculous. I think people will say anything to try and prove their point, which by the way, has proven to me that this person did not prove it at all, and if anything showed how far people will go to dispute creationism. By the way, who created the liver?

Answer 2

All an organ transplant proves is that an organ may or may not be compatible with the genetic makeup of another individual. If it is compatible, the body will accept it, if it's not compatible, the body will reject it.

Although...I do find it interesting that the human body will accept the heart of a babboon, and function on a limited basis, for a limited amount of time in the human body.

Compatibility can suggest relationship....relationship could suggest a possible evolutionary link.

"What xenotransplants have been done?

There have only been a few attempts at human xenografting over the years, but no human solid organ xenograft projects are currently approved by the FDA. "Baby Fae", a child born with a malformed heart survived for a short period of time with a baboon heart. Two men were transplanted with livers from baboons at the University of Pittsburgh. These patients lived for several weeks. And in late 1995 a man with AIDS was transplanted with the bone marrow of a babboon. He is still alive and doing well as of April 1, 1996, but there is not yet evidence that the baboon cells are helping his immune system."

Found here....http://www.stanford.edu/dept/HPS/transplant/html/frequently_asked_questions.html

Answer 3

i think he may have been getting at the idea that any organ can adapt and be used in any other human's body.... but i don't know it is a desperate stretch-

on the other hand to any CREATIONISTS who claim that believing the work of men like Darwin and Richard Dawkins (to name but the two most famous evolutionary scientists) is a stretch and that scientists will believe anything that is fed to them- please remember that you are believing a subjective work written over 10 000 years ago by MEN who had little or no idea how the world worked and knew nothing of the universe... is it really the evolutionists who are the most gullible?? (unless you were joking in which case I'm sorry for being such a literalist fool... but you never quite know on here)

Answer 4

every physique who says "you at the instant are not the main suitable till you bypass to the WWE" is a f*cking fool. i will call loads of wrestlers interior the international not in WWE that are 10x better than over a million/2 of the WWE roster precise now. Austin Aries, Chris Hero, Davey Richards, KENTA, Kota Ibushi, Shingo, AJ varieties, Samoa Joe, Desmond Wolfe, Christopher Daniels, homicide, Mistico, Motor city gadget weapons, The Briscoes, youthful greenbacks/technology Me, Dragon youngster, Colt Cabana, and so on.. Can every physique actually say with a as we talk face say that the WWE roster is super? Can every physique actually say that a roster with Sheamus, The Miz, super Khali, David Otunga, Vladimir Kozlov, Mark Henry, Hornswoggle, John Cena and Randy Orton is super? i don't care in the event that they have Chris Jericho, area and CM Punk, the WWE roster precise now as an entire is truthfully poor. WWE isn't the main suitable promoting interior the international and that i don't understand how every physique ought to assert they are. WWE has a number of the worst wrestlers interior the international precise now (super Khali and Mark Henry are 2 examples). and to not point out the reality that WWE does not care with regard to the midcard titles. it quite is a shame what the IC identify, the Tag group titles, and the U.S. identify have become over the final 5 years. they are truthfully meaningless. WWE marks/fanboys provides me as many thumbs down's as they want yet i don't provide a sh*t. BQ: confusing to % because they are all super tag communities, yet i think of i visit bypass with the The Briscoes.

Answer 5

Most of those things don't last. They like pig parts too. You guys know that if you take out a rib, it will grow back don't you? That won't happen with your leg. Now what exactly do you think that proves?

Answer 6

Only if you consider interspecies transplants, like using a baboon heart in a human heart transplant. The fact that this is possible demonstrates how close our DNA is. That strongly indicates that we came from common ancestry.

Answer 7

Did not GOD do the first transplant by taking a rib from Adam and creating Eve with it?

Answer 8

For proof of evolution go here:
http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/comdesc/

Don't rely on your inbox, please. But was the letter you got similar to what Nondescrip said above? If that's the case, then you are guilty of misrepresentation.

Answer 9

That's ridiculous.

Answer 10

Well, considering that evolution is a manmade invention what can we expect? But my personal favorite is when they try to equate the theory of Gravity, as proof that evolution is true, just how dumb can people get?