I've heard the argument that there is no evidence to prove or indicate that there's a God. But exactly what would? If you saw a "miracle", something that seemed to defy natural law, would you just say we have to expand our ideas of what can happen naturally? Or would you say that it has to be explainable by natural law because there's no such thing as magic or our current concept of natural law HAS to explain everything, invalidating the evidence to protect a belief? Or would you say it is magic? Or would you say it's a miracle? Doesn't the interpretation of an event go down to the core of our soul and get filtered by what we want to see?
2007-08-17
10:21:53
·
5 answers
·
asked by
LG
7
in
Society & Culture
➔ Religion & Spirituality