No.
Nonexistence implies he's not necessary (for what we see anyway), but being unnecessary does not imply nonexistence.
2007-08-17 07:42:48
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
No, but we can't prove God unnecessary until we figure out how our universe and planets works. Perhaps God keeps the Universe from flying apart? We won't know until we figure out what the hell gravity is.
2007-08-17 07:46:09
·
answer #2
·
answered by Atlas 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Well to prove God unnessary is going agianst what he is about so you are saying that what he is about is un true which could be defined as him not being real. In saying that I'd say Yes there the same
2007-08-17 07:45:19
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
You don't have to prove to any one that God exist. If they don't know, just tell them about Him, and its up to them to believe.
If you believe and have faith, that Jesus Christ came and died for our sins, you are saved by the grace of God. You know you will have ever lasting life. Its up to each and every one to believe for them selves/ you don't have to prove anything.
2007-08-17 07:52:39
·
answer #4
·
answered by Herb E 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
God quit and is collecting unemployment in Godsylvania. I there is a God, she is quite an underachiever, because this world is one screwed up place.
2007-08-17 07:45:57
·
answer #5
·
answered by Big Momma Carnivore 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
The need to 'prove' suggests unbelief. Lack of faith. Without faith, there is no need to even mention God at all.
2007-08-17 07:44:00
·
answer #6
·
answered by SANCHA 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
No, but showing that a particular god is based on myths and legends is sufficient to prove that particular god is fiction.
2007-08-17 07:44:24
·
answer #7
·
answered by wondermus 5
·
1⤊
1⤋
Agree with Meaty. Necessity is independent from existence.
2007-08-17 07:44:10
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
No something being necessary and something being real are to completely different things. Something can be fake yet necessary, something can be real yet unneeded, and something can be both at once or neither.
2007-08-17 07:47:43
·
answer #9
·
answered by draconum321 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Not in my mind, no.
I know God does not interfere here, he is unnecessary. I also know there is no proof that there is a God.
2007-08-17 07:44:39
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋