English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

15 answers

Good question.

When people say "Support a Libertarian," I appreciate that - I probably identify more with the Libertarian Party than any other - but let's face it: it's not realistic. You are in fact throwing your vote away. People thought it was cute to vote for Green Party Nader in 2000; result: "W."

Now it's true that if enough people were willing to get behind a third party, we could really change things; but people are VERY entrenched. Politics is just another case of "Tastes great!/Less Filling!" for the majority of idiots with suffrage. It's a contest between two meaningless, symbolic viewpoints.

As Bill Maher says, "We don't have two parties in this country - we have identical cousins played by Patty Duke."

2007-08-17 05:21:16 · answer #1 · answered by jonjon418 6 · 1 0

I likewise echo your sentiments; seems like we have 2 choices: right wing idiots or left wing idiots; there are some other parties, but generally speaking most people and politicians do not get involved with them because they seek the popularity and power of the 2 major parties; until more people use common sense and realize we need alot more than just 2 corrupt parties, there is little that can be done, at least in the short term.

2007-08-17 05:22:07 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Nothing really. Sadly enough a vote for anyone else just takes away from Democratic votes. I for one would love not to have to choose between the two only. More choices would be nice, the general public just isn't informed enough. Try not to get too into politics, it's just disappointing.

Plus there are too many idiot Republicans around.. yuk.

2007-08-17 05:33:37 · answer #3 · answered by Awesome-O 3 · 0 0

Ron Paul does not cowtow to the power elite like every other candidate. If they are in the CFR, and I think all of them are, they are part of the club that controls the major media, oil, banks, the Federal Reserve, multinnational industry, and the governments. Hillary has been chosen by them as was Bill and of course the Bushes. They don't care what party in in power they have agendas to fit either one. Obama is too naive, though maybe well meaning. I'm not sure what his connections have been.

2007-08-17 05:23:03 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

purely uninterested in the Republican occasion this is purely too afraid/spineless to furnish opposition to this socialist anti-revolution. isn't the McCain info sufficient that meant moderates do no longer attraction to votes. Republicans won't win till they stop taking political advice from Democrats.

2016-12-12 04:52:36 · answer #5 · answered by newcomer 4 · 0 0

You could always fill in a name, try being creative. I'm considering writing down "Chuck Norris". I'm a Republican but I don't like the candidates on either side at the moment. You have to admit, Norris 08 has a ring to it.

2007-08-17 05:21:12 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

Go to the political section

2007-08-17 05:36:04 · answer #7 · answered by Kaliko 6 · 0 0

Move to Vermont -- there's a plan for Libertarians to flood the state, then secede from the rest of the United States.

2007-08-17 05:25:09 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2 2

I want a box on the ballot that says None of the above.

2007-08-17 05:18:50 · answer #9 · answered by LaptopJesus 5 · 2 0

Vote for the third party person.

2007-08-17 05:52:03 · answer #10 · answered by Steel Rain 7 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers