http://www.newscientist.com/blog/lastword/2007/03/twin-chicks.html#nbicomments
2007-08-17 03:41:26 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
Oh! Can I have one over hard, broken yoke, inside an omelet?
2007-08-17 03:53:04 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Wow! I learned something new this morning. Thanks for passing that along.
Edit: "Jesus M," I respectfully suggest you check out the link provided. Read the posting from the curator of the British Museum of Natural History. Look at the numerous photographs. Why are you dismissing factual physical evidence, even when it can't possibly conflict with your religious superstitions? Could it be that you are so "spiritual" you deny the literal existence of anything that isn't part of your subjective experience? If so, you are far more "Christ-like" most modern folks. You may actually be a practicing Solipsist, as was Christ and everyone else from His era, and believe your own subjective experience actually forms the basis of reality. Beginning 400 years ago, Galileo Galilei discovered and Isaac Newton confirmed that it is actually the physical realm which is the basis of reality, thus beginning the scientific revolution. I suggest you revise your personal philosophy to include objective (physical) reality, which is the basis of all modern thinking.
2007-08-17 11:06:27 · answer #2 · answered by Diogenes 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
When little girls were in their mummies' womb, they already had eggs in them.
2007-08-17 10:47:16 · answer #3 · answered by Irreverend 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
No truth. It is a matter of propaganda.
jtm
2007-08-17 10:47:38 · answer #4 · answered by Jesus M 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I liked that article a lot, thanks for sharing.
2007-08-17 10:51:50 · answer #5 · answered by Pooperific 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋