English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Less than 3,000 Americans died in the 9/11 attacks. Since then Bush has sent over 3,700 young Americans to their deaths in Iraq and over 450 young Americans to their deaths in Afghanistan. Since Bush is responsible for more American deaths than Bin Laden who in reality is Americas greatest enemy?

2007-08-16 22:11:24 · 36 answers · asked by Sean D 3 in Politics & Government Military

36 answers

I think they're both the same, because although bush is a ******* moron and has no reason to be in politics, he has at least "moderately" good intentions, so that counts for something, although if Bin Laden was given the chance, he would kill that many anyway.

2007-08-16 22:16:22 · answer #1 · answered by Jesse 3 · 0 7

Bin Laden. If we sat on our behinds without going to Afghanistan, they could have continued to attack us. Without the support of the American people you cannot expect the President to make all of the public satisfied with his decisions. Deal with it....he is not going anywhere for a year and a half. I am not sitting here saying that I agree with the decisions that he makes but there is absolutely nothing that we can solve by complaining about every decision that he makes. The only thing this does is further divide the country and annoy people. Sure, the president is not the best in history but go ahead and slap yourself for considering that the President is more of an enemy than Bin Laden.

2007-08-17 02:49:36 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Your a freaking moron. What kind of question is this? Hypothetically ... lets say we did not go to war..we just did nothing. YOU are sitting in your home watching Martha Stuart not hurting anyone. Minding your own biz like you do everyday and then you hear a loud boom. You walk outside and see that someone has blown the neighborhood elementary school up with the kids inside. now I wonder...who could have prevented this monstrosity? I know who....the TROOPERS FIGHTING OVER THERE...Why are they there? There so YOU can be safe. You want to try to put Bush on the same level as Bin Laden? Freedom is not free

2007-08-16 23:56:15 · answer #3 · answered by casperii69ii 2 · 3 0

At Pearl Harbor on Dec. 7, 1941, 2,403 Americans were killed during the attack. Total American deaths in World War 2, according a report by the Congressional Research Service, and prepared for congress and updated as recently as June 29, 2007, was 405,399.

Using your logic, FDR was a greater threat to the United States than Hitler or the Japanese.

2007-08-16 23:24:26 · answer #4 · answered by Jam_Til_Impact 5 · 3 0

Their related so they both the USA biggest enemys if bush hated bin laden so much he would have went after bin laden instead of going to Iraq. But cousin s stick together RIGHT

2007-08-17 02:14:29 · answer #5 · answered by jaeleeamari2904 1 · 0 0

I don't believe that my answer will stay on here because all the good Conservative people seem to be loosing their rights on Yahoo, but I am going to answer it anyway.

The count of 911 is not less than 3,000 lives. Last toll was 3,478. Not that that is the point, but your wording is misleading.
And, "Bush sent over" is misleading also. The men and women that fight for our country joined the military. They decided to go and because of this should be honored. Don't put them in a category of mindless individuals that couldn't make up their own minds and are being sent by anybody.

And I thank God they did, because if BUSH hadn't sent them, as you so elegantly put it, who knows what other 9/11 events would have occurred and what that death toll would have been then!

Thanks to the troops for letting me feel safer!

2007-08-16 22:29:11 · answer #6 · answered by momsplinter 4 · 5 1

You can only say that because we'll never know how many more americans Bin Laden would have killed if BUsh hadn't sent troops into Iraq and Afghanistan.

2007-08-16 22:23:27 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 6 1

By the same type of reasoning Lincoln,Wilson, FDR, Kennedy and Johnson even bigger enemies should be considered . Don' forget to include the automobile which causes more deaths than our losses in Iraq .

2007-08-16 22:18:37 · answer #8 · answered by DrIG 7 · 4 0

Considering that Bush could have stopped 9/11 if he would of actually read his PDBs I would say that he is responsible for that also.

2007-08-17 01:35:45 · answer #9 · answered by the_end_of_the_cons 5 · 1 0

Your a sick person if you include Bush in your list.
There is a huge diffrence between a terrorist and Bush.
We are at war to stop terriorism.
If you hate President Bush so much, please leave the country. Try your freedoms in Iraq.

2007-08-16 22:41:40 · answer #10 · answered by wishiwas 4 · 3 0

In a sense bin laden is kind of getting what he wanted because of bush - more deaths. I know it's horrible that I even said that but in a way it's true.

2007-08-16 22:14:24 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 1 3

fedest.com, questions and answers