Go to: /www.findinternettv.com/Video,item,3457290868.aspx to see it. Or Google 'Cheney 1994' and check out one of the dozens of sites with this interview.
2007-08-16 18:22:12 · 6 answers · asked by roscoedeadbeat 7 in Politics & Government ➔ Military
The video was from 1994. It is irrelevent like this question. Do you suppose anything may have changed since 1994... 13 years ago? If you are going to try and make a point about the present situation... try presenting information that actually applies in any way to the current situation.
2007-08-16 18:31:52 · answer #1 · answered by Mr. Perfect 5 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Oz never did give nothing to the Tinman that he didn't already have, and cause never was the reason for the evening or the topic of Sir Galahad.
2007-08-16 18:30:17 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Just a joke!!! Do you think his change of heart may have had something to do with working for Haliburton. He still knew the perils of an invasion but was looking at it from a purely profit view in 2002!!!!!!!
2007-08-16 18:29:13 · answer #3 · answered by Jay H 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Yea 13 years ago the profit margin was far less, for his stocks and he was not CEO of Halliburton yet but now that he has millions in stock options and prefferd stocks ....it's a go.
2007-08-16 18:36:33 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Oh, probably about the same thing that you think about Queen Hillary the Great's senior thesis at Wellesley:
www.freedomunderground.org/
HillaryClintonThesis.pdf
Wouldn't you agree?
2007-08-16 18:39:00 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
I belive it's called double talk
2007-08-16 18:25:47 · answer #6 · answered by djfunkygrrl 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋