As a basis for war, the Bush Administration accuses Iraq of trying to acquire weapons of mass destruction (chemical, biological, nuclear), supporting terrorism, and brutalizing their own people. Since Iraq is not the only country engaged in these actions, under what circumstances should the US go to war with other such nations, in addition to going to war with Iraq?
2007-08-16 06:57:17 · 11 answers · asked by dloc 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Military
Tactical oppotunity. Remember, we are fighting al-Qaeda everywhere whether you see it or not.
2007-08-16 07:07:49 · answer #1 · answered by druszka717 3 · 4⤊ 0⤋
First of all for those that do not remember The UN Inspection Team found make shift processing equipment that had traces of chemical agents. IN IRAQ. the only part missing was the delivery system and for those that were in the first conflict with Iraq we were witness to the delivery system SCUDS. So let it rest. just because the actual chemicals were missing when we arrived does not mean there was none.
2007-08-16 08:13:06 · answer #2 · answered by bulletbob36 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
This is incorrectly posted. It should be under politics, or maybe elections, not military. Aside from the inclusion of the words, "war", "Iraq," it's nothing more than a diatribe against the administration.
Categorize correctly. Categorize your question in the appropriate category - you will receive better and more relevant answers.
DON'Ts
1. Use Yahoo! Answers as a soapbox to vent your frustrations, rant, or otherwise violate the question and answer format. If you prefer to have discussions or chat with others, please use one of Yahoo!'s other community services, such as Yahoo! Groups or Yahoo! Messenger Chat Rooms.
2007-08-16 07:34:04 · answer #3 · answered by gugliamo00 7 · 4⤊ 0⤋
Read the below link. It's the Congressonal Resolution which authorized the use of military force against Iraq. Precious little mention of your WMDs issue in the reasons put forth by the Congress.
2007-08-16 07:57:16 · answer #4 · answered by desertviking_00 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
For 8 long years under the misguided leadership of Bill Clinton and the commucrat party, they accused Saddam of having WMDs. You sheep swallowed (like Monica did) and followed. Bush said it in 2001 and up come the yellow flags of "No War". Which is it? Did he have them and Clinton told the truth or did he have them and Bush lied? See how I worded that like a commucrat so you could understand it?
2007-08-16 07:17:31 · answer #5 · answered by citizenvnfla 4 · 4⤊ 0⤋
talk to your senator and your congressman about this, they will make the decision, 75% of the people on here would have no idea (since they are under 17) p.s. Iran is next if they keep breaking all the rules like Iraq did too many times to count...
2007-08-16 07:07:24 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 0⤋
Just as soon as were done with Iraq.
Thats why iran is doing everything in their power, to keep iraq unstable.
They know they are next.
2007-08-16 07:26:53 · answer #7 · answered by jeeper_peeper321 7 · 3⤊ 0⤋
BEFORE "they" come into the United States and explode buildings and kill innocent men, women and children...before
terrorists take out your family members with bombs,
chemicals, and/or gas..... if America doesn't, they will get you and your loved ones first....one by one.....cause that is what "they" want to do.... eliminate you and all that you have.
That's why......
2007-08-16 07:19:53 · answer #8 · answered by LIzzz 6 · 4⤊ 0⤋
When other countries refuse to allow inspectors in to inspect as agreed by them,,when they invade another country for no reason
2007-08-16 07:05:36 · answer #9 · answered by LAVADOG 5 · 8⤊ 0⤋
Lets just nuke them all
2007-08-16 07:04:34 · answer #10 · answered by Rawbert 7 · 7⤊ 1⤋