Yup, the Nuremberg Doctrine was our creation.
Waging Aggressive Warfare and Offenses against human Dignity woud be a start.
2007-08-16 07:21:54
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
3⤋
What war crimes? Site specifics, because only fringe radicals are saying there have been any committed by the current administration. The UN isn't even saying anything about 'war crimes.' Let alone any legitimate group that doesn't stand to gain politically by saying such things.
This is no more intelligent then the people calling the American president 'Hitler.' Or believing a person like Michael Moore that is profiting by making Hollywood movies. Learn to think for yourself.
And please don't pretend to mourn the loss of thousands of brave American GIs in the context of your question. Those American GIs are serving purely because the volunteered to do so. President Bush is not a facist dictator and our military is made up of volunteers that believe in what they do. The ones that have been lost do not need nor want your fake sympathy. I'm sure they'd rather you appreciate their sacrifice.
2007-08-16 08:21:59
·
answer #2
·
answered by Patriotic Libertarian 3
·
6⤊
1⤋
properly, shall we see, they tried to explode the WTC in ninety 3, succeeded on 911, to not point out distinctive thousand different assaults around the globe against u.s., and you % conflict crimes trial for BUSH?!?!? provide me ruin!!!! If it wasn't for the shortcoming of harmless lives, Bush ought to pull out, take a seat back and wait until an identical anybody is crying, desiring him to entice close reason " the super undesirable terrorists blew up the Lincoln Tunnel, or the Golden Gate Bridge, or perhaps exploded a grimy bomb in la, Houston or Chicago. You cant have your cake and devour it too. We the two combat them the place they stay, or take a seat back and wait on yet another ask your self like we've been doing for the final two decades. No President interior the previous has made a ambitious circulate to wrestle Terrorism in all this time. All we get is lip service. I wager those sailors on the united statesCole desires we had taken the risk greater heavily. What approximately people who died on 911?? do not you think of they could % an accounting for act those human beings led to?
2016-12-15 17:04:44
·
answer #3
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
YOU wouldn't know what a war crime was if it kidnapped you, beat you, raped you, cut your head of with a rusty knife and televised the event, then dragged your carcass down the street for everyone to flay and defecate on.
But by golly, don't let our boys put underwear on the heads of enemy combatants!
You knee-jerk liberals haven't got a testical or a brain cell among you. You spout this drivel without a clue of what you're talking about, or ANY historical context of the world in which you live. Away with you, before I vomit!
Thank you to the author of the question for the private hate mail. I have framed it and placed it on my trophy wall under the title "More liberals I have irritated." And don't patronize me, sonny. Unless you have lived a VERY unusual life, it's unlikely that you have anything to teach me.
2007-08-16 13:11:40
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
1⤋
In that interview, Cheney was talking about the First Gulf War. The war was ten years before the attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon. Moveon.org should look at the context of the interview.
BTW. Can you actually list war crimes that the US would be guilty of?
2007-08-16 07:40:56
·
answer #5
·
answered by wichitaor1 7
·
8⤊
2⤋
Do you have proof of actual war crimes, or are you getting all your "facts" from an obviously slanted, biased website? Or are you, like so many, one of those that only cares about the war because it gives you a convenient reason to bash a president you don't like? The U.S. has gone out of its way--more than any other nation in history--to adhere to the Geneva Conventions during this war; technically the Geneva Conventions don't even apply to insurgents, as they are not a legitimate military in a conventional war. Nor do American laws apply to them or to Gitmo detainees, in terms of civil rights; those are reserved for American citizens, and even those can be denied to American citizens who are actively killing or planning to kill other Americans. Check your laws again and keep the political slant and slander nonsense out of it, and get a real picture of what's going on over there. Listening to people who stand to gain from a failure and a retreat is unwise, and people like that do NOT have the best interests of this country, or Iraq, in mind or at heart.
Most veterans of this war, if you bother to listen to them instead of handpicking the one or two dissidents among us, know better and think that websites like this and the people that take them as gospel are full of sh**, and are deliberately allowing themselves to be brainwashed.
2007-08-16 07:12:14
·
answer #6
·
answered by ಠ__ಠ 7
·
9⤊
1⤋
You cite Moveon.org as a source ??? That already make the question irrelevant. Now just exactly what war crimes has the administration commited ? Be very specific, cite the specific crime and section of law you claim they have violated.
2007-08-16 07:44:05
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
8⤊
1⤋
What section of the Geneva Conventions were violated?
2007-08-17 08:52:40
·
answer #8
·
answered by Its not me Its u 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
What war crimes? The only war criminals are the ones that are kidnapping innocent people, torturing them, and then leaving their dead bodies on the streets. Iraq was a tactical error at the worst. At least we took out a very real threat, Saddam, and are killing al-Qaeda on THEIR turf. Politicians ALWAYS screw up wars, the Bush Admin. is no different. Why dont you but out and let us do our job.
2007-08-16 07:04:43
·
answer #9
·
answered by druszka717 3
·
10⤊
2⤋
How much is George Soros paying you? Or is this George Soros himself posing as a "regular citizen? Oh, you almost had me, George! Nice try! MOVE ON!
2007-08-16 08:57:11
·
answer #10
·
answered by hooahwife 3
·
3⤊
1⤋