English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

28 answers

Thanks for the opportunity.
Here's a source for the questioners true statement:

Borel's Law.
(Even Darwin had his doubts about the validity of Evolutionary Theory.)

2007-08-15 13:53:06 · answer #1 · answered by Bobby Jim 7 · 0 0

Darwin had weird ideas about noses, that's all I know. His premise about evolution may have been primitive, however, I think his observations about adaptations are accurate, and a good basis for the rest of the refining details we have all found along the way. His work opened our eyes to the world around us, and gave us back our wonder. It was an exciting time to be alive. Many changes happening in the world. So much to explore, so little time. Don't you like digging up things when you were a kid? Remember that rush of excitment when you found an old sardine can? I wish that upon you your entire life.

2007-08-15 20:43:32 · answer #2 · answered by Shinigami 7 · 1 0

Dear Mr. Creationist (or whatever your handlers tell you to call it this week),

Another 30 board-feet of pasting the same arguments does not change the fact that they are still as wrong as when we debunked them all the first time.

You have absolutely zero ability to comprehend what you paste, and as such, when you come across the same argument already shredded here at a later date it appears brand new to you. It is a truly sad state, and you need to grasp that you only highlight your own mental deficiency by persisting with the cut and paste marathon.

Were you able, on even the simplest level, to grasp the concepts involved, you would recognize the repetitive nature of your posts. As it is, you do not even have that elementary comprehension of the topic at hand.

Sadly, this is how creationism works, they rely on the vehement and vociferous response of their most ignorant and uneducated of followers to speak for them. They pot up the article, fully knowing the lies, distortions, and misleading nature of them and wait for people like you to cry them from the mountaintops.

We know the creationist movement to be dishonest to it's core, because the articles they produce requires a pretty decent knowledge of astronomy, cosmology, geology, anthropology, and a variety of other sciences... yet it is deliberately twisted and distorted in to outright lies. And this is not the type of misunderstanding that comes from a bad grasp of the topic, it required in-depth lies and trickery to produce.

So climb that mountain again, Rainman, and tell us again how wrong we are.

2007-08-17 16:32:52 · answer #3 · answered by Atheist Geek 4 · 0 0

Evolution theory has evolved (so to speak) since Darwin. We've actually learned new facts, and it's changed the way we look at things. Difficult concept for religious people to understand, I know.

2007-08-15 20:40:57 · answer #4 · answered by jonjon418 6 · 2 1

True. They claim there is a missing link between a bent spine and a straight one. And yet they try to teach evolution as a fact without even finding such a thing.

They have problems,

2007-08-15 20:41:08 · answer #5 · answered by rose_ovda_night 4 · 1 2

No, it confirms the principles, but shows the process was much richer than Darwin envisioned.

2007-08-15 20:49:22 · answer #6 · answered by novangelis 7 · 0 0

What I know is that the evolution theory of Darwin is outdated and approved to be false for many other reasons as well.

2007-08-15 20:43:38 · answer #7 · answered by sobeit 1 · 1 2

Nope

2007-08-15 20:41:14 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

uh.. no it doesnt. it proves it with the fact that the fossils show how other animal and early humans were shaped like.

2007-08-15 20:39:48 · answer #9 · answered by lins 5 · 2 1

Says who?

And if you actually had proof (not flawed arguments copied from creationist websites), then why would you be wasting your time here? You should be out publishing this!

2007-08-15 20:39:32 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 5 1

fedest.com, questions and answers